[2022] KEELRC 730 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 730 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner was constructively dismissed by the respondents through the arbitrary stoppage of her salary for 37 months without notice or an opportunity to be heard. This conduct amounted to unfair labour practice and violated her constitutional rights to fair labour practices, fair...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 730 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nasra Abdirahman Adan; Respondent: The County Public Service Board – Mandera; Respondent: The County Government of Mandera
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E074 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Petition allowed. Judgment for the petitioner.
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Fair Labour Practices, Right to Dignity, Non Discrimination, Fair Administrative Action, Reinstatement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constitutional Law Constructive Dismissal Fair Labour Practices Right to Dignity Non Discrimination Fair Administrative Action Reinstatement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nasra Abdirahman Adan

Applicant

The County Public Service Board – Mandera

Respondent

The County Government of Mandera

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner was constructively dismissed from employment by the respondents in violation of her constitutional and statutory rights.
  2. 2 Whether the stoppage of the petitioner.s salary without notice or hearing constituted unfair labour practice and breach of fair administrative action.
  3. 3 Whether the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement, compensation, and arrears of salary for the period of non-payment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner was constructively dismissed by the respondents through the arbitrary stoppage of her salary for 37 months without notice or an opportunity to be heard. This conduct amounted to unfair labour practice and violated her constitutional rights to fair labour practices, fair administrative action, non-discrimination, and dignity. The respondents failed to provide any justification or evidence to counter the petitioner.s claims. The court held that the petitioner had proved her case on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to reinstatement to her former position without loss of salary, benefits, or rank, as well as payment of arrears for the period of...

Court Disposition

Petition allowed. Judgment for the petitioner.

Orders

  • Declaration that the constructive dismissal of the petitioner was unlawful and wrongful and violated her constitutional rights.
  • Respondents to reinstate the petitioner to her former position with immediate effect and without loss of salary, benefits, or rank.