[2013] KEHC 5192 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 5192 (KLR)

The court held that while the IEBC has the mandate to resolve nomination disputes, the issue of citizenship, being a fundamental constitutional right and a qualification for elective office, cannot be determined summarily or on the basis of insufficient evidence. The court found that the IEBC's decision to revoke...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 5192 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Nassir Mohamed Dolal; Respondent: The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: The Returning Officer Garissa Township Constituency; Respondent: Orange Democratic Movement (ODM); Respondent: Omar Sheikh Ali; Interested Party: Hon Hassan Ali Joho; Interested Party: Hazel Katana
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 44 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition_allowed
Judges
DAS Majanja, CC Kipkorir, GV Odunga
Legal Topics
Citizenship Qualification, Election Nominations, Fundamental Rights
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Citizenship Qualification Election Nominations Fundamental Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nassir Mohamed Dolal

Petitioner

The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

The Returning Officer Garissa Township Constituency

Respondent

Orange Democratic Movement (ODM)

Respondent

Omar Sheikh Ali

Respondent

Hon Hassan Ali Joho

Interested Party

Hazel Katana

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the IEBC could revoke a nomination certificate on the basis of alleged dual citizenship without proper determination of citizenship status.
  2. 2 Whether the issue of citizenship as a qualification for nomination can be determined by the IEBC or should be addressed at the petition stage under the Constitution and the Citizenship and Immigration Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while the IEBC has the mandate to resolve nomination disputes, the issue of citizenship, being a fundamental constitutional right and a qualification for elective office, cannot be determined summarily or on the basis of insufficient evidence. The court found that the IEBC's decision to revoke the petitioner's nomination certificate on the ground of alleged dual citizenship was improper, as the determination of citizenship status requires adherence to the specific provisions of the Constitution and the Citizenship and Immigration Act. The court therefore set aside the IEBC's decision and allowed the petitioner to present his nomination papers to the returning officer.

Court Disposition

petition_allowed

Orders

  • The decision of IEBC dated 28th January 2013 in IEBC/NDRC/41/2013 is set aside.
  • The petitioner is at liberty to present nomination papers to the respective returning officer.