[2013] KEHC 4464 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4464 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had followed all legal procedures in acquiring the suit land, including obtaining the necessary consents and title deed. The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged as the defendants did not file any defence or appear in court. As the registered owner, the plaintiff is entitled to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4464 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Nathan Barasa Watila; Defendant: Wekesa Sangura; Defendant: Alex Barasa; Defendant: Geoffrey Wanyonyi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 108 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's case allowed. Permanent injunction and eviction orders granted.
Legal Topics
Title Deed Ownership, Eviction Orders, Permanent Injunction, Land Transfer Process
Source Language
en
Land and Property Title Deed Ownership Eviction Orders Permanent Injunction Land Transfer Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nathan Barasa Watila

Plaintiff

Wekesa Sangura

Defendant

Alex Barasa

Defendant

Geoffrey Wanyonyi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff lawfully acquired title to land parcel E. Bukusu/N. Nalondo/2218.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to eviction orders against the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had followed all legal procedures in acquiring the suit land, including obtaining the necessary consents and title deed. The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged as the defendants did not file any defence or appear in court. As the registered owner, the plaintiff is entitled to exclusive possession and enjoyment of the land. The court therefore granted the plaintiff's prayers for eviction of the defendants and a permanent injunction restraining them from interfering with the land.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's case allowed. Permanent injunction and eviction orders granted.

Orders

  • Defendants to vacate the suit land within ninety (90) days.
  • In default, the plaintiff is at liberty to evict the defendants.