[2017] KEHC 1651 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant, having been admitted as an advocate, became ineligible to hold an auctioneer's licence by operation of section 10(2)(c) of the Auctioneers Act. The subsequent registration of a partnership did not alter the fact that the licence was originally issued to the appellant as a sole proprietor, and he retained an interest in the business. The court held that the appeal was not arguable and that the appellant had not demonstrated grounds for the grant of a stay of the respondent's decision. Accordingly, the application for stay was dismissed with costs to the respondent.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 1651 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Nathan Pala; Respondent: Auctioneers Licensing Board
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2017
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 377 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- LM Njuguna
- Legal Topics
- Auctioneers Licensing, Professional Ineligibility, Partnership Law, Stay of Decision
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nathan Pala
Appellant
Auctioneers Licensing Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an advocate can continue to hold or benefit from an auctioneer's licence under the Auctioneers Act after admission to the bar.
- 2 Whether the addition of partners to an auctioneering firm affects the ineligibility of a sole proprietor who becomes an advocate.
- 3 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant, having been admitted as an advocate, became ineligible to hold an auctioneer's licence by operation of section 10(2)(c) of the Auctioneers Act. The subsequent registration of a partnership did not alter the fact that the licence was originally issued to the appellant as a sole proprietor, and he retained an interest in the business. The court held that the appeal was not arguable and that the appellant had not demonstrated grounds for the grant of a stay of the respondent's decision. Accordingly, the application for stay was dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The application dated 25th July, 2017 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment