[2013] KEHC 4778 (KLR)
The court found that since the plaintiff had applied to withdraw both the suit and the application dated 8th November, 2012, and the defendant had not entered appearance or filed a defence, it was appropriate to allow the withdrawal. Consequently, all interim orders, including the inhibition registered against L. R....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4778 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Nathaniel Kithinji Ikiugu; Defendant: Vincent Moravi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 172 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Withdrawal of Suit and Application Before Hearing
- Outcome
- Suit and application withdrawn; interim orders set aside; inhibition lifted; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Withdrawal of Suit, Inhibition Orders, Land Sale Agreements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nathaniel Kithinji Ikiugu
Plaintiff
Vincent Moravi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Withdrawal of Suit and Application Before Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to withdraw the suit and the application dated 8th November, 2012.
- 2 Whether the inhibition order registered against L. R. No.NTIMA/IGOKI/6748 should be lifted as a result of the withdrawal.
- 3 Whether any costs should be awarded upon withdrawal of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since the plaintiff had applied to withdraw both the suit and the application dated 8th November, 2012, and the defendant had not entered appearance or filed a defence, it was appropriate to allow the withdrawal. Consequently, all interim orders, including the inhibition registered against L. R. No.NTIMA/IGOKI/6748, were to be lifted. The court further directed that the plaintiff must serve the defendant with a written notice of discontinuance within 30 days, in accordance with Order 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and that such notice would be deemed to have withdrawn the case. The court exercised its discretion not to award costs to any party.
Court Disposition
Suit and application withdrawn; interim orders set aside; inhibition lifted; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The plaintiff's application dated 8th November, 2012 is marked as withdrawn and all interim orders granted therein are set aside.
- The order of inhibition registered against L. R. No.NTIMA/IGOKI/6748 is to be lifted forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Meru
Environmental & Land Case 172 of 2012 [if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif]
NATHANIEL KITHINJI IKIUGU.....................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
VINCENT MORAVI.........................................................................DEFENDANT
RULING
This suit was filed by way of a plaint on 8th November, 2012. In the plaint, the plaintiff prayed for judgment against the defendant for:
(a) an order of specific performance of the sale agreement dated 15. 6.2012 to the effect that L. R. No.NTIMA/IGOKI/6748 be transferred into the Plaintiff's name.
(b) Costs and interest at Court rates.
Under a Certificate of Urgency in a Notice of Motion dated 8th November, 2012, the plaintiff filed an application that sought the following orders:
1. That this application be certified urgent and the same be herd exparte in the 1st instance.
2. That pending interpartes hearing of this application or until further orders of the Court, an order of inhibition, be issued, prohibiting any kind of dealings with L. R. No.NTIMA/IGOKI/6748.
3. That pending the hearing and determination of the suit an order of inhibition be issued, prohibiting any kind of dealings with L. R. No.NTIMA/IGOKI/6748.
4. That costs of the application be provided for.
On 12th November, 2012, the Hon. Justice J. A. Makau ordered:
1. THAT Status Quo be maintained pending hearing before Environment and Land Court. Matter to be mentioned on 27. 11. 2012 before Environment and Land Court.
The matter was mentioned before me on 27th November 2012 and on 19th February, 2013.
On 19th February, 2012, Mr. Rimita, holding brief for Mwirigi Kaburu for the plaintiff, informed the Court that the defendant despite service had never entered appearance and had not filed his defence. Nevertheless, he informed the Court that the plaintiff wished to withdraw both the suit and his application dated 8th November, 2012. He also wanted the inhibition registered against L. R. No.NTIMA/IGOKI/6748 lifted.
I have considered this oral application carefully and rule as follows:
1. The plaintiff's application dated 8th November, 2012 is hereby marked as withdrawn and as a consequence any interim orders granted in the application are automatically set aside.
2. As a result of the withdrawal of the plaintiff's application dated 8th November, 2012, the order of inhibition registered against L. R. No.NTIMA/IGOKI/6748 should be lifted forthwith.
3. In accordance with Order 25 of the Civil, Procedure rules, the Plaintiff should within 30 days serve the defendant in writing a Notice of his wholly discontinuance with the suit herein. That notice will be deemed to have withdrawn the case.
4. I make no award as to costs.
Dated at Meru this 19th day of February, 2013.
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE
Delivered in open court his 19th day, of February, 2013 in the presence of:
Rimita h/b Mwirigi Kaburu for plaintiff
Cc. Mwonjaru
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE
[if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; text-autospace:ideograph-other; font-size:12. 0pt;"Liberation Serif","serif";} </style> <![endif]