[2000] KEHC 465 (KLR)

[2000] KEHC 465 (KLR)

The court found that the 3rd defendant, by executing a written guarantee and subsequently acknowledging liability in a letter dated September 16, 1999, made clear and unequivocal admissions of liability for the credit card charges incurred by the 1st defendant. The 3rd defendant's failure to honour the repayment...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KEHC 465 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: National Bank Of Kenya Limited; Defendant: Electro-Sigma Company Ltd; Defendant: __MISSING__
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 884 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Application for Judgment on Admission
Outcome
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the 3rd defendant on admission with costs.
Legal Topics
Judgment on Admission, Guarantee Liability, Credit Card Debt
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Judgment on Admission Guarantee Liability Credit Card Debt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Bank Of Kenya Limited

Plaintiff

Electro-Sigma Company Ltd

Defendant

__MISSING__

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Application for Judgment on Admission

  1. 1 Whether the 3rd defendant admitted liability to the plaintiff for the credit card charges incurred by the 1st defendant.
  2. 2 Whether judgment should be entered against the 3rd defendant on the basis of the admission.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 3rd defendant, by executing a written guarantee and subsequently acknowledging liability in a letter dated September 16, 1999, made clear and unequivocal admissions of liability for the credit card charges incurred by the 1st defendant. The 3rd defendant's failure to honour the repayment proposals and lack of any substantive defence left no triable issue. Accordingly, the court held that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment on admission against the 3rd defendant under Order 12 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the 3rd defendant on admission with costs.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the plaintiff against the 3rd defendant on admission.
  • The 3rd defendant shall pay the plaintiff's costs of the application.