[2003] KEHC 520 (KLR)
The court found that there was a greater risk of injustice in denying the defendant an opportunity to present his case than any prejudice that might be suffered by the plaintiff if the ex parte judgment was set aside. The court exercised its discretion to set aside the ex parte judgment, emphasizing the importance...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] KEHC 520 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: National Bank of Kenya; Defendant: Peter Komen Kima
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 335 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendant's application to set aside ex parte judgment allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Service of Summons, Default of Appearance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Bank of Kenya
Plaintiff
Peter Komen Kima
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ex parte judgment and decree should be set aside due to alleged non-service of summons on the defendant.
- 2 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to enter appearance and file defence out of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was a greater risk of injustice in denying the defendant an opportunity to present his case than any prejudice that might be suffered by the plaintiff if the ex parte judgment was set aside. The court exercised its discretion to set aside the ex parte judgment, emphasizing the importance of allowing parties to be heard on merit, especially where there is a dispute as to service of summons.
Court Disposition
Defendant's application to set aside ex parte judgment allowed.
Orders
- The ex parte judgment and decree of 16th January, 1998 are set aside.
- The defendant is granted leave to enter appearance and file defence out of time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPULIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CIVIL SUIT NO. 335 OF 1997
NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA ………………………………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS PETER KOMEN KIMA …………………………………………DEFENDANT
RULING
This is an application under Order IXA Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”) and Sections 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21). In it, the Defendant seeks, in pertinent part, the following order:
“3. This Honourable Court be pleased to set aside the ex parte Judgment and decr ee of this Court of 16 th January, 1998 and to grant leave to the Defendant to enter appearance and file defence out of time.”
The substance of the Defendant’s case is that he was not served with Summons to Enter Appearance and a copy of the Plaint. There is, however, on record an affidavit of service sworn on September 17, 1997 by one Wilson K. Sang, a process server of this Court to the effect that Summons to Enter Appearance and a copy of the Plaint were served on the Defendant on September 16, 1997 at 10. 30 a.m. at the Defendant’s home at Moi’s Bridge for which he refused to sign.
The power of this Court to set aside ex parte Judgments entered in consequence of non-appearance and default of defence is set out in order IXA Rule 10 of the Rules in the following terms:
“Where Judgment has been entered under this order the Court may set aside or vary such Judgment and any consequential decree or order upon such terms as are just.”
As was pointed out in Shah v. Mbogo [1967] EA 116, this power is exercised to obviate injustice or hardship resulting from accident, inadvertence, or excusable mistake or error. It is a wide power which, as was pointed out in Patel v. Cargo Handling Services Ltd [1974] E. A. 75, has no limitation.
Considering the case before me, I am of the view that there is a likelihood of greater danger in shutting out the Defendant from presenting his case than can be suffered by the Plaintiff were the ex parte Judgment set aside. In view of this conclusion, it shall not be useful to go into the other matters agitated before me.
I, therefore, allow the Defendant’s application dated March 4, 2003 and order the costs thereof and costs thrown away to be in the cause.
Dated and Delivered at Nakuru this 18th day of June, 2003.
ALNASHIR VISRAM
JUDGE