[2004] KEHC 713 (KLR)
The court held that the application for release of the vehicles and logbooks was misconceived because the vehicles were not attached pursuant to a court order but were repossessed by the plaintiff under the hire purchase agreement. The objection proceedings by the third party were also improper in this context....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 713 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: National Industrial Credit Bank; Defendant: Joseph Irungu Nduate; Objector: Peter Mbuthia Mundinia
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 759 of 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Release of Motor Vehicles and Logbooks
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Hire Purchase Disputes, Repossession Procedure, Objection to Attachment, Execution of Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Industrial Credit Bank
Plaintiff
Joseph Irungu Nduate
Defendant
Peter Mbuthia Mundinia
Objector
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Release of Motor Vehicles and Logbooks
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can order the release of motor vehicles and logbooks held by the police to the plaintiff as the legal owner.
- 2 Whether the objection proceedings filed by the third party were proper in the context of repossession rather than attachment.
- 3 Whether the application for release is properly before the court given the vehicles were not attached by court order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the application for release of the vehicles and logbooks was misconceived because the vehicles were not attached pursuant to a court order but were repossessed by the plaintiff under the hire purchase agreement. The objection proceedings by the third party were also improper in this context. Furthermore, the court found that it could not order the release of the vehicles or logbooks as their custody by the police and CID was not clearly linked to the civil proceedings and could be related to criminal investigations. Therefore, the court dismissed the application for lack of proper basis and jurisdiction to grant the orders sought.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 5th November 2004 is dismissed for being misconceived.
- There shall be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL DIVISION, MILIMANI
CIVIL SUIT NO. 759 OF 2000
NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CREDIT BANK………………………….....PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOSEPH IRUNGU NDUATE ………………………………………...…DEFENDANT
And
PETER MBUTHIA MUNDINIA …………………………………………OBJECTOR
R U L I N G
The Plaintiff has come to court under Order 50 Rules 1 and 2 Order 21 rule 58 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 3 & 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.
The Plaintiff seeks the following prayers: -
That this Honourable court do issue and order for the release of Motor Vehicle bearing registration Number KAC 050 held at Ongata Rongai Police Station to the Plaintiff forthwith as the legal owner.
That the logbook for motor vehicles registration numbers KAG 107S, KAE 311Dheld by the District Criminal Investigating Officer – Ongata Rongai Police Station be released to the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff entered into a Hire Purchase agreement with the defendant for the hire of vehicle registration number KAG 107S. The defendant failed to pay the required instalments due to the plaintiff and also hid the vehicle the subject of the hire purchase agreement, from the plaintiff. As a consequence of that the plaintiff filed the present suit and has judgment in its favour.
The only warrants of attachment issued hereof were issued to the auctioneers Nyalgunga Traders on or about May 2002. The said auctioneers returned those warrants unexecuted on expiry of the same, on or about 25th September 2002.
The Plaintiff thereafter began to pursue warrant of arrest against the defendant/judgment debtor.
It seems that on or about 20th August 2004 and 4th October 2004 the Plaintiff in exercise of its rights under the hire purchase agreement gave repossession orders to an auctioneers to attach vehicles registration No.KAE 311D and KAG 107S. The repossessors found that the defendant had cannibalised the two vehicles by changing their registration numbers and their engine numbers. The vehicles were also found in possession of a third party who allegedly purchased them from the defendant.
The repossessors it seems, with the assistance of the police, impounded the said vehicles and the same were stored at Ongata Rongai Police Station.
It ought to be remembered that the action of repossession has nothing to do with the present suit. That as it may be the person from whom the vehicles were repossessed from filed through this suit objection to the attachment. The plaintiff acknowledges that there was no place for that objection in this suit for the deponent of the affidavit in support of the present application stated in paragraph 15 of that affidavit;
“That the objection was improper in the first place as this matter is not an attachment but a repossession.”
Since that is the correct position of this matter I am of the view that the present applicant is misconceived because the vehicles were not attached due to an order of this court. The circumstances under which the vehicles are in the custody of Ongata Rongai Police Station is not clear to me under which circumstances the logbooks are with CID, how then can I order them to be released. They could, for all I know, be the subject of a criminal proceedings.
For the aforesaid reasons the application dated 5th November 2004 is dismissed for being misconceived. There shall be no order as to costs.
Dated and delivered this 15th day of December 2004.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE