[2008] KEHC 1581 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 1581 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, as the concerned trade union, demonstrated sufficient interest and a prima facie arguable case to justify the grant of leave to commence judicial review proceedings. However, the court declined to grant a stay of the Registrar's decision, reasoning that the union could continue to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 1581 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: National Union of Water and Sewerage Employees; Respondent: The Registrar of Trade Unions; Interested Party: Rashid Kivyasyo Shakombo; Interested Party: Simon Maina; Interested Party: Paul Kiprotich Koech; Interested Party: Jack Omino; Interested Party: Philemon O. Atik; Interested Party: Lydia Hadulu; Interested Party: Mwarumba Mwondosha; Interested Party: Nancy Muthoni Ndegwa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 378 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Leave to File Judicial Review
Outcome
Leave to file judicial review granted; stay orders declined; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Leave, Trade Union Registration, Certiorari and Prohibition, Union Officials Deregistration
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Judicial Review Leave Trade Union Registration Certiorari and Prohibition Union Officials Deregistration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Union of Water and Sewerage Employees

Applicant

The Registrar of Trade Unions

Respondent

Rashid Kivyasyo Shakombo

Interested Party

Simon Maina

Interested Party

Paul Kiprotich Koech

Interested Party

Jack Omino

Interested Party

Philemon O. Atik

Interested Party

Lydia Hadulu

Interested Party

Mwarumba Mwondosha

Interested Party

Nancy Muthoni Ndegwa

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Leave to File Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has sufficient interest and a prima facie arguable case to warrant leave for judicial review proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether leave granted should operate as a stay of the Registrar's decision revoking registration of union officials.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as the concerned trade union, demonstrated sufficient interest and a prima facie arguable case to justify the grant of leave to commence judicial review proceedings. However, the court declined to grant a stay of the Registrar's decision, reasoning that the union could continue to operate and that only specific officials were affected by the deregistration. The court held that no irreparable or substantial loss would be occasioned to the applicant by refusing the stay, and that the merits of the substantive judicial review application would be determined at the hearing of the main motion.

Court Disposition

Leave to file judicial review granted; stay orders declined; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Service of prior notice to the Registrar is dispensed with.
  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file judicial review proceedings for certiorari and prohibition as requested.