[2023] KEHC 22600 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established an arguable case for leave to apply for judicial review by demonstrating that a decree and certificate of order for costs had been issued against the government, and that the respondent had failed to satisfy the decretal sum despite demand. The requirements for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 22600 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lydia Nchekei; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nanyuki
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review E003 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Leave to apply for judicial review granted.
- Judges
- AK Ndung'u
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Mandamus, Government Liability, Decree Enforcement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lydia Nchekei
Applicant
Hon. Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established an arguable case for leave to apply for an order of mandamus against the Attorney General.
- 2 Whether the requirements for granting leave to seek judicial review have been satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established an arguable case for leave to apply for judicial review by demonstrating that a decree and certificate of order for costs had been issued against the government, and that the respondent had failed to satisfy the decretal sum despite demand. The requirements for leave under Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules were met, justifying the grant of leave to seek an order of mandamus. The court therefore allowed the application and directed that the substantive motion be filed as provided by law.
Court Disposition
Leave to apply for judicial review granted.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicant to apply for an order of mandamus as sought.
- The substantive application shall be filed as provided for in Order 53 Rule 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Nchekei v Attorney General (Judicial Review E003 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 22600 (KLR) (27 September 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 22600 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nanyuki
Judicial Review E003 of 2022
AK Ndung'u, J
September 27, 2023
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS FOR AN ORDER OF MANDAMUS AND IN THE MATTER OF GOVERNMENT PROCEEDINGS ACT CAP 20 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 8 AND 9 OF LAW REFORM ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF SATISFACTION OF DECREE IN NANYUKI CM CIVIL CASE NO. 132 OF 2015
Between
Lydia Nchekei
Exparte Applicant
and
Hon. Attorney General
Respondent
Ruling
1. The ruling concerns the chamber summons dated November 14, 2022 brought under Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The main relief sought in the chamber summons is leave to apply for judicial review, the specific order to be sought being mandamus –“to compel the Hon Attorney General to pay, or cause to be paid, the decretal sum of Kshs 831,600/- with interest at 12% per annum from October 08, 2018 until payment in full being the decretal sum in Nanyuki CM Civil Case No 132 of 2015.
2. The application is at the Ex Parte stage. I have read the supporting affidavit and the statement of facts. In a nutshell, it is the Exparte Applicant’s case that she is a judgment debtor in Nanyuki CM Civil Case No 132 of 2015 where she was issued with a decree dated September 23, 2020 for an amount of Kshs 831,600/- inclusive of costs and interests. That the Applicant was subsequently issued with a certificate of order for costs against the government on February 25, 2021 and the Respondent has to date failed, refused and/or ignored to settle the said decretal amount despite relentless demand by the Applicant.
3. In the circumstances, the Applicant has established an arguable case and I accordingly allow the application and grant the leave sought to seek judicial review. Let the substantive application be filed as provided for in Order 53 Rule 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules. It is so ordered.
4. Costs of this application shall be in the substantive motion.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NANYUKI THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023A.K. NDUNG’UJUDGE