[2024] KEELRC 2826 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 2826 (KLR)

The court determined that the interests of justice would be best served by maintaining the status quo regarding the petitioners' employment positions pending the hearing and determination of the petition. The court found that interlocutory applications should not delay the expeditious disposal of the main petition....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2826 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kiptoo Ndalut; Applicant: Grinnin Chogo Libabu; Respondent: Nairobi City Water & Sewerage Company Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Employment and Labour Relations Petition E099 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Petition / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
Status quo regarding petitioners' employment positions to be maintained pending disposal of the petition; strict timelines for submissions set; non-compliance by petitioners will lift the status quo order automatically.
Judges
K Ocharo
Legal Topics
Status Quo Orders, Interlocutory Relief, Employment Positions, Written Submissions, Case Management
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Status Quo Orders Interlocutory Relief Employment Positions Written Submissions Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kiptoo Ndalut

Applicant

Grinnin Chogo Libabu

Applicant

Nairobi City Water & Sewerage Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Petition / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the status quo regarding the petitioners' acting employment positions should be maintained pending determination of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether interlocutory applications should be entertained or the petition should be expedited on its merits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the interests of justice would be best served by maintaining the status quo regarding the petitioners' employment positions pending the hearing and determination of the petition. The court found that interlocutory applications should not delay the expeditious disposal of the main petition. Therefore, the court ordered that the status quo be preserved, set strict timelines for the filing and exchange of written submissions, and provided that failure by the petitioners to comply with the timelines would result in the automatic lifting of the status quo order. The court emphasized the need for efficiency and timely resolution of employment disputes, balancing the...

Court Disposition

Status quo regarding petitioners' employment positions to be maintained pending disposal of the petition; strict timelines for submissions set; non-compliance by petitioners will lift the status quo order automatically.

Orders

  • The status quo obtaining now as regards the Petitioners’ employment positions be maintained pending disposal of the petition.
  • The petition be canvassed by way of written submissions.