[2016] KEHC 2693 (KLR)
The court found that the Director of Surveys and District Land Registrar, Nakuru District, have a statutory duty to establish and/or re-establish boundaries for landowners upon request. The applicant had made the necessary payments and requests, but the respondents failed to act. The County Surveyor was not a proper...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 2693 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ndeffo Company Limited; Respondent: Director of Surveys; Respondent: County Surveyor, Nakuru County; Respondent: District Land Registrar, Nakuru District; Interested Party: David N Chege; Interested Party: Wilson Nganga; Interested Party: Anthony Kanyari
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review 9 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Substantive Motion for Mandamus
- Outcome
- Order of mandamus granted against the Director of Surveys and District Land Registrar; case against County Surveyor dismissed; costs awarded to applicant against 1st and 3rd respondents.
- Judges
- MA Silau
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Disputes, Mandamus Orders, Public Officer Duties
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ndeffo Company Limited
Applicant
Director of Surveys
Respondent
County Surveyor, Nakuru County
Respondent
District Land Registrar, Nakuru District
Respondent
David N Chege
Interested Party
Wilson Nganga
Interested Party
Anthony Kanyari
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Substantive Motion for Mandamus
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Director of Surveys and District Land Registrar can be compelled by mandamus to survey and mark boundaries of the applicant's land.
- 2 Whether the County Surveyor is a proper party to the proceedings given the timing of the office's creation.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs against the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Director of Surveys and District Land Registrar, Nakuru District, have a statutory duty to establish and/or re-establish boundaries for landowners upon request. The applicant had made the necessary payments and requests, but the respondents failed to act. The County Surveyor was not a proper party as his office was created after the events in question and the land was not under county government lease. The court held that the failure of the Director of Surveys and District Land Registrar to perform their public duty justified the issuance of an order of mandamus compelling them to act within 30 days. The applicant was entitled to costs against the 1st and 3rd...
Court Disposition
Order of mandamus granted against the Director of Surveys and District Land Registrar; case against County Surveyor dismissed; costs awarded to applicant against 1st and 3rd respondents.
Orders
- Order of mandamus compelling the Director of Surveys and District Land Registrar, Nakuru District, to proceed to LR No. 445/1 (also known as LR No. 9970) and establish and/or re-establish its boundaries by affixing beacons or other appropriate boundary marks within 30 days of service of the order.
- Case against the County Surveyor, Nakuru County, is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
JUDICIAL REVIEW NO 9 OF 2015
REPUBLIC …………………………..……APPLICANT
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF SURVEYS …..….…1ST RESPONDENT
COUNTY SURVEYORS………....…2ND RESPONDENT
DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR …..3RD RESPONDENT
DAVID N CHEGE
WILSON NGANGA
ANTHONY KANYARI ……....…INTERESTED PARTIES
EX-PARTE NDEFFO COMPANY LIMITED
RULING
(Judicial review motion for an order of mandamus to compel District Surveyor to survey land and place beacons; public has a legitimate expectation that public officers will perform their duties; order of mandamus is issued against District Land Registrar)
1. This is a judicial review motion seeking an order of mandamus to compel the respondents, that is the Director of Surveys, the County Surveyor of Nakuru County, and the District Land Registrar, to visit the land parcels of land known as L.R No. 445/1 (also known as L.R No. 9970) and establish the original beacons between the said land and the land parcels L.R No. 445/3 and L.R No. 5286.
2. The applicant is the owner of the land parcel L.R No. 445/1. In the year 2000 a boundary dispute arose relating to the said land and the applicant reported it to the District Land Registrar, Nakuru. They also wrote to the District Surveyor requesting him to resolve the boundary dispute. A payment of Kshs. 83,400/= was made to facilitate the officers and a receipt was duly issued. A further payment of Kshs. 2,500/= was also made. Despite these and various correspondences, the ex-parte applicant has averred that the respondents have declined to resolve the boundary.
3. It is stated by the ex-parte applicant that an effort was made by the respondents to visit the site on 20 January 2010 but the necessary equipment was not carried by the respondents. Another visit was made on 22 March 2011 and a promise to return was made but this never materialized. It is clearly out of frustration that the ex-parte applicant has now sought for orders to compel the officers to sort out the boundary.
4. Only the 2nd respondent filed a replying affidavit sworn by Mr. Robert Ontiti, the County Surveyor Nakuru County. He has deposed that no correspondences touching on the subject matter have ever been written to him. He has averred that the County Surveyor ought not to be a party to the case as it is an office created after the year 2013. It is his view that the offices of the Director of Surveys and District Land Surveyor are the persons to deal with the matter and the said offices are still in existence.
5. I have considered the matter. All that the ex-parte applicant wants is to have a determination of boundaries to land that it owns. It is a legitimate expectation of all persons that officers entrusted with a public duty will perform their said duties when called upon to do so. It is of course the duty of the Director of Surveys and his subordinates to mark and point out boundaries to persons who own land. I really do not see how the Director of Surveys and District Land Registrar, Nakuru, can justify not performing their public duties. It is the very reason why the public pays them.
6. That said, I think the ex-parte applicant was wrong in enjoining the County Surveyor of Nakuru County. Probably the correct party ought to have been the District Surveyor, Nakuru County, who is an employee of the Ministry of Lands. The County Surveyor is an employee of the County Government and since the land, from what I can see, is not a County Government lease, the correct party ought to have been the District Surveyor, Nakuru District. I am therefore unable to compel the 2nd respondent to undertake a task which is not within its mandate. The case against the 2nd respondent is dismissed but I make no orders as to costs.
7. I do not see how this suit cannot succeed as against the 1st and 3rd respondents. As I have mentioned earlier, it is their duty to establish and/or re-establish boundaries. I therefore issue an order of mandamus compelling the Director of Surveys, and District Land Registrar, Nakuru District, to proceed to the land parcel LR No. 445/1 also known as LR No. 9970 and establish and/or re-establish its boundaries by affixing beacons or other appropriate boundary marks. They should do so within 30 days of service of this order. The applicant shall have costs of this suit as against the 1st and 3rd respondents.
8. It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Nakuru this 21st day of September 2016.
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT NAKURU
In presence of: -
Ms. Wangari for applicant
No appearance for the respondents
C/Assistant: Janet
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT NAKURU