[2022] KEELC 48 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 48 (KLR)

The court found that the preliminary objection raised by the 1st defendant, which challenged the court's jurisdiction and alleged that the suit was res judicata, could not be determined without first perusing the records and determinations in Homa Bay CMC Misc Application No. 18 of 2008 and Ndhiwa PM’s ELC No. 3 of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 48 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: John Ndege; Plaintiff: Odhiambo Ndege; Defendant: Peter Owino Okinda; Defendant: Land Registrar, Homa-Bay Land Registry; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 11 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Preliminary objection not determined; further directions issued pending perusal of previous case records.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Jurisdiction, Res Judicata, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Jurisdiction Res Judicata Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Ndege

Plaintiff

Odhiambo Ndege

Plaintiff

Peter Owino Okinda

Defendant

Land Registrar, Homa-Bay Land Registry

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain and determine the suit against the 1st defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the suit is res judicata under section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act.
  3. 3 Whether the originating summons offends procedural or substantive law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the preliminary objection raised by the 1st defendant, which challenged the court's jurisdiction and alleged that the suit was res judicata, could not be determined without first perusing the records and determinations in Homa Bay CMC Misc Application No. 18 of 2008 and Ndhiwa PM’s ELC No. 3 of 2020. The court held that a fair and just determination required calling for and reviewing the records of the previous cases to ascertain whether the issues raised in the current suit had been conclusively determined. Accordingly, the court ordered the Deputy Registrar to urgently call for the records of the two cases and extended the interim preservation orders pending further...

Court Disposition

Preliminary objection not determined; further directions issued pending perusal of previous case records.

Orders

  • The Deputy Registrar is to urgently call for the records and determinations, if any, in Homa Bay CMC Misc Application No. 18 of 2008 and Ndhiwa PM’s ELC No. 3 of 2020.
  • Interim preservation orders of 9th November 2021 are extended.