[2024] KEELC 5001 (KLR)
The Court found that the Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 was predicated on a Plaint whose heading indicated it was filed in the Senior Magistrate’s Court at Ruiru, while the verifying affidavit referenced the Environment and Land Court at Thika. This inconsistency meant that there was no competent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 5001 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Margaret Wanjira Ndehi (Suing on behalf of Super Micro Ventures Self Help Group); Defendant: Peter Njogu Kimuhu; Defendant: Land Registrar, Ruiru
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Thika
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E049 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Motion for Injunction
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 struck out with costs to the 1st Defendant.
- Judges
- JG Kemei
- Legal Topics
- Temporary Injunctions, Striking Out of Pleadings, Limitation of Actions, Res Judicata, Sub Judice
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Wanjira Ndehi (Suing on behalf of Super Micro Ventures Self Help Group)
Plaintiff
Peter Njogu Kimuhu
Defendant
Land Registrar, Ruiru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Motion for Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 is competent before the Court.
- 2 Whether the suit is time barred under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act.
- 3 Whether the suit is res judicata or sub judice in light of Ruiru SPMCC No. E024 of 2023.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 was predicated on a Plaint whose heading indicated it was filed in the Senior Magistrate’s Court at Ruiru, while the verifying affidavit referenced the Environment and Land Court at Thika. This inconsistency meant that there was no competent substantive suit before the Environment and Land Court at Thika to support the application for interlocutory relief. As a result, the application was incompetent and liable to be struck out. The Court did not proceed to determine the merits of the preliminary objection or the substantive issues raised by the 1st Defendant, as the threshold issue of competency was dispositive.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 struck out with costs to the 1st Defendant.
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 is struck out.
- Costs awarded to the 1st Defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Ndehi (Suing on behalf of Super Micro Ventures Self Help Group) v Kimuhu & another (Environment & Land Case E049 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 5001 (KLR) (24 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 5001 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Thika
Environment & Land Case E049 of 2024
JG Kemei, J
June 24, 2024
Between
Margaret Wanjira Ndehi (Suing on behalf of Super Micro Ventures Self Help Group)
Plaintiff
and
Peter Njogu Kimuhu
1st Defendant
Land Registrar, Ruiru
2nd Defendant
Ruling
1. Before Court is the Plaintiff’s/Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 seeking in the main temporary injunction against the 1st Defendant from interfering or dealing in any way with land title number Ruiru Kiu Block 2 (Githunguri)/18315, Ruiru Kiu Block 2 (Githunguri)/18316, Ruiru Kiu Block 2 (Githunguri)/18317 and Ruiru Kiu Block 2 (Githunguri)/18318 (hereinafter the suit properties) pending the hearing and determination of this suit. In the alternative and without prejudice to the forgoing, the Plaintiff prays for status quo in respect of the suit properties be maintained pending the hearing of the suit. The Application is based on the grounds on the face of it and the Supporting Affidavit of Margret Wanjiru Ndehi, the Plaintiff.
2. In objection, the 1st Defendant filed a Preliminary Objection dated 26/4/2024 stating that the suit is time barred in light of Section 7 Limitation of Actions Act Cap 22. Contemporaneously she filed her Notice of motion of even date raising the pleas of res judicata and sub judice on the basis of another suit namely Ruiru SPMCC No. E024 of 2023 between the instant parties.
3. The 2nd Defendant did not file any response.
4. On 30/4/2024 directions were taken and parties elected to prosecute the Motions and Preliminary Objection by way of written submissions.
5. Before delving into the merits of the 1st Defendant’s Preliminary Objection and Application, it is imperative to address the competency of the Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024. The Application is expressed under Order 40 rule 1, Order 51 and Sections 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Act.
6. The Application is predicated on a Plaint dated 2/4/2023 whose heading is ‘In the Senior Magistrate’s Court at Ruiru ELC of 2023’. The accompanying Verifying Affidavit reads ‘In the Environment and Land Court at Thika ELC Case No of 2024’. These two pleadings are at variance and more worrying is the effect that in light of the said ‘Plaint’ there is no substantive suit before this Court for the Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 to stand on.
7. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion dated 3/4/2024 is for striking out with costs to the 1st Defendant only.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT THIKA THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS.J G KEMEIJUDGEDelivered online in the presence of;Plaintiff/Applicant – AbsentMs. Muiruri for 1st Defendant/Respondent2nd Respondent - AbsentCourt Assistants – Phyllis/OliverELCLC E049. 2024 - THIKA 2R of 2