[2025] KECPT 170 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 170 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had properly withdrawn her membership by written notice and was entitled to a refund of her savings. The Respondent failed to provide credible evidence of having refunded Kshs. 10,000/= to the Claimant, as no certified M-pesa statement or proof of ownership of the alleged phone...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 170 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Justina M. Ndeleva; Respondent: Manatwa Sacco Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 992/E1051 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed in full
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Withdrawal of Membership, Burden of Proof, Interest on Deposits
Source Language
en
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure Sacco Member Refunds Withdrawal of Membership Burden of Proof Interest on Deposits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Justina M. Ndeleva

Applicant

Manatwa Sacco Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of her savings upon withdrawal from the Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent has discharged the burden of proving partial refund of Kshs. 10,000/= to the Claimant.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to interest and costs on the refunded amount.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had properly withdrawn her membership by written notice and was entitled to a refund of her savings. The Respondent failed to provide credible evidence of having refunded Kshs. 10,000/= to the Claimant, as no certified M-pesa statement or proof of ownership of the alleged phone number was produced. The Tribunal held that the Claimant was entitled to the full amount claimed, Kshs. 171,590/=, as the Respondent did not demonstrate any outstanding liabilities or valid reason for withholding the refund. The Tribunal further held that the Claimant was entitled to interest at Tribunal rates from the date of filing, as the Respondent failed to refund the...

Court Disposition

claim allowed in full

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the Claimant for the sum of Kshs. 171,590/=.
  • The Respondent shall pay interest at Tribunal rates from the date of filing until payment in full.