[2023] KEELC 16244 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 16244 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to grant the adjournment despite inadequate medical evidence, emphasizing that this would be the final adjournment for the plaintiffs in Case No. 5 of 2010 and the defendants in Case No. 128 of 2020. The court imposed strict conditions: the 2nd plaintiff must file and serve a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 16244 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Bernard Mwangi Nderitu; Plaintiff: Hesbon Omondi; Plaintiff: Francis Rumono; Plaintiff: Peter Wambugu; Plaintiff: Stephen Kamau; Plaintiff: Mary Wambu (Deceased); Defendant: Ndiara Enterprise Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 5 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Adjournment Application / Ruling on Applications for Adjournment Prior to Trial
Outcome
Adjournment granted with strict conditions and costs imposed.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Adjournment of Hearing, Court Discretion, Costs of Adjournment, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Adjournment of Hearing Court Discretion Costs of Adjournment Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bernard Mwangi Nderitu

Plaintiff

Hesbon Omondi

Plaintiff

Francis Rumono

Plaintiff

Peter Wambugu

Plaintiff

Stephen Kamau

Plaintiff

Mary Wambu (Deceased)

Plaintiff

Ndiara Enterprise Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Adjournment Application / Ruling on Applications for Adjournment Prior to Trial

  1. 1 Whether the applications for adjournment by the various parties should be granted.
  2. 2 Whether sufficient cause has been shown for the adjournment requests.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs and consequences of the adjournment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to grant the adjournment despite inadequate medical evidence, emphasizing that this would be the final adjournment for the plaintiffs in Case No. 5 of 2010 and the defendants in Case No. 128 of 2020. The court imposed strict conditions: the 2nd plaintiff must file and serve a notice to act in person by a specified date; the parties seeking adjournment must pay both court adjournment fees and witness expenses for the opposing parties before the next court date. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of the suit for the plaintiffs in Case No. 5 of 2010 and the case proceeding undefended against the defendants in Case No. 128 of 2020. The decision...

Court Disposition

Adjournment granted with strict conditions and costs imposed.

Orders

  • 2nd plaintiff to file and serve notice to act in person by close of business on March 9, 2023.
  • Adjournment marked as the last one for plaintiffs in Case No. 5 of 2010 and defendants in Case No. 128 of 2020.