[2025] KECPT 231 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 231 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that Muguku Kimathi & Company Advocates was not on record for any party in the suit and that no costs had been awarded to any party represented by that firm. The bill of costs filed on 14th October 2024 was therefore without basis and was struck out. The Tribunal further held that the proceedings...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 231 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Kirobi Ndiba; Respondent: New Milimani Sacco; Respondent: Top Link Auctiooneers
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 704 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Bill of Costs and Closure of File
Outcome
Bill of costs struck out; proceedings of 14/09/2023 vacated; file closed with no orders as to costs.
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw
Legal Topics
Costs Awards, Bill of Costs, Party Representation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Costs Awards Bill of Costs Party Representation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Kirobi Ndiba

Applicant

New Milimani Sacco

Respondent

Top Link Auctiooneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Bill of Costs and Closure of File

  1. 1 Whether the bill of costs filed by Muguku Kimathi & Company Advocates was properly before the Tribunal.
  2. 2 Whether any costs were awarded to a party represented by Muguku Kimathi & Company Advocates.
  3. 3 Whether the proceedings of 14/09/2023 were valid and should stand.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Muguku Kimathi & Company Advocates was not on record for any party in the suit and that no costs had been awarded to any party represented by that firm. The bill of costs filed on 14th October 2024 was therefore without basis and was struck out. The Tribunal further held that the proceedings of 14/09/2023 were erroneously conducted and were vacated. The file was marked as closed with no orders as to costs, as the matter had been concluded by consent on 5/08/2024, retaining the Tribunal's ruling of 30/11/2023 as final. Any subsequent filings or affidavits by persons not party to the suit or after the matter's determination were without jurisdiction and effect.

Court Disposition

Bill of costs struck out; proceedings of 14/09/2023 vacated; file closed with no orders as to costs.

Orders

  • The bill of costs dated 14th October 2024 is struck out.
  • The proceedings of the Tribunal taken on 14/09/2023 are declared erroneous and vacated.