[2015] KEHC 2395 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2395 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant's notice of motion seeking to dismiss the originating summons had remained unprosecuted since 10th March 2014, constituting inordinate delay. Additionally, the court noted that the defendant had acted in breach of a subsisting injunctive order by interfering with the plaintiff's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 2395 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ndichu Kahuha; Defendant: Peter Njeru Stanley
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 101 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Notice of Motion
Outcome
Plaintiff's application granted; defendant's notice of motion dismissed.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Injunctive Relief, Breach of Court Order, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Injunctive Relief Breach of Court Order Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndichu Kahuha

Plaintiff

Peter Njeru Stanley

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's notice of motion dated 10th March 2014 should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant acted in contempt of the court's injunctive order by interfering with the plaintiff's possession and destroying property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant's notice of motion seeking to dismiss the originating summons had remained unprosecuted since 10th March 2014, constituting inordinate delay. Additionally, the court noted that the defendant had acted in breach of a subsisting injunctive order by interfering with the plaintiff's possession and destroying property. The court held that a party in contempt should not be allowed to benefit from their own wrongful conduct. Consequently, the plaintiff's application to dismiss the defendant's notice of motion was granted, and the defendant's application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application granted; defendant's notice of motion dismissed.

Orders

  • The defendant's notice of motion dated 10th March 2014 is dismissed.