[2023] KECA 1523 (KLR)

[2023] KECA 1523 (KLR)

The court found, based on the Deputy Registrar's report, that the applicant lacked the means to pay the assessed court fees and that the delay in filing the appeal was attributable to this inability. Exercising its discretion under Rule 120 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the court granted the applicant leave to file...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECA 1523 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Titus Musembi Ndiso; Respondent: Rureri Wahome; Respondent: Julius M Nkanata t/a Zebra Safaris Ltd; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) E001 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal as a Pauper and Extension of Time
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
GV Odunga
Legal Topics
Pauper Appeals, Court Fees Waiver, Extension of Time, Appeal Lodgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Pauper Appeals Court Fees Waiver Extension of Time Appeal Lodgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Titus Musembi Ndiso

Appellant

Rureri Wahome

Respondent

Julius M Nkanata t/a Zebra Safaris Ltd

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal as a Pauper and Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal as a pauper and be exempted from paying the assessed court fees of Kshs. 100,000.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found, based on the Deputy Registrar's report, that the applicant lacked the means to pay the assessed court fees and that the delay in filing the appeal was attributable to this inability. Exercising its discretion under Rule 120 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the court granted the applicant leave to file the appeal as a pauper, allowing the appeal to be lodged without payment of the Kshs. 100,000 court fees, which would instead be recovered from any award made in the applicant's favour. The court also extended the time for filing and serving the record of appeal by 14 days from the date of the ruling, finding the delay excusable under the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file the appeal without paying the assessed court fees of Kshs. 100,000.
  • The court fees shall be recovered from any award made to the applicant upon successful recovery from the respondent.