[2023] KECPT 71 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 71 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide evidence that Kisumu Centre Jua Kali Artisans Sacco Limited and Kisumu Centre Jua Kali Sacco Limited are the same legal entity. The accounts identified by the applicant are held in the name of Kisumu Centre Jua Kali Sacco Limited, not the named Judgment Debtor....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 71 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Owino Ndonga; Respondent: Kisumu Centre Juakali Artisan Coop Society Limited; Respondent: Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited; Respondent: Chase Bank Limited; Respondent: Jamii Bora Bank Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 254 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Garnishee Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion and Garnishee Orders
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, M. Mbeneka
Legal Topics
Garnishee Proceedings, Debt Enforcement, Party Identity, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Garnishee Proceedings Debt Enforcement Party Identity Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Owino Ndonga

Applicant

Kisumu Centre Juakali Artisan Coop Society Limited

Respondent

Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited

Respondent

Chase Bank Limited

Respondent

Jamii Bora Bank Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Garnishee Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion and Garnishee Orders

  1. 1 Whether the Garnishee Orders Nisi can be made absolute against the named banks to satisfy the decretal sum owed by the Judgment Debtor.
  2. 2 Whether Kisumu Centre Jua Kali Artisans Sacco Limited and Kisumu Centre Jua Kali Sacco Limited are the same legal entity for purposes of enforcement.
  3. 3 Whether the Garnishees hold funds belonging to the Judgment Debtor.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide evidence that Kisumu Centre Jua Kali Artisans Sacco Limited and Kisumu Centre Jua Kali Sacco Limited are the same legal entity. The accounts identified by the applicant are held in the name of Kisumu Centre Jua Kali Sacco Limited, not the named Judgment Debtor. As a result, the Garnishees cannot be compelled to release funds from accounts not belonging to the Judgment Debtor. The application for Garnishee Orders Absolute therefore fails for lack of proof of the necessary party identity and entitlement to the funds sought to be attached.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The amended Notice of Motion dated December 11, 2018 and amended on April 4, 2019 is dismissed with costs.
  • No Garnishee Order Absolute is issued against the named Garnishees.