[2005] KEHC 435 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 435 (KLR)

The court found that the retainer between the applicant and respondent was not disputed and that the application for judgment on taxed costs was unopposed. The certificate of taxation was produced, and the court was satisfied that the application had been duly served. In the absence of any opposition or dispute as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] KEHC 435 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nduati Charagu & Company Advocates; Respondent: Zacky Hinga Munyua
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 103 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed
Judges
CN Mugo
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Certificate of Taxation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Certificate of Taxation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nduati Charagu & Company Advocates

Applicant

Zacky Hinga Munyua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment on the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the retainer between the applicant and respondent is disputed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the retainer between the applicant and respondent was not disputed and that the application for judgment on taxed costs was unopposed. The certificate of taxation was produced, and the court was satisfied that the application had been duly served. In the absence of any opposition or dispute as to retainer, and upon consideration of the submissions and documents presented, the court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as certified. The application was therefore allowed as prayed.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant for the sum of Kshs.214,500 as per the certificate of taxation dated 19th November 2004.