[2025] KEHC 1027 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 1027 (KLR)

The court found that the parties, specifically the Applicant, had failed to comply with the directions and orders issued by consent on 29th October, 2024. The Applicant's counsel was absent and no explanation for non-compliance was provided. Given that the consent orders were time-bound and there was no compliance...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 1027 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Catherine Kanyiri Nduati; Respondent: Stewart Robert Wairumbi Thagichu; Respondent: Benjamin Mukiri Kimani
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E027 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Compliance With Consent Orders and Dismissal of Application
Outcome
application dismissed for non-compliance with consent orders; liberty to execute granted to respondents
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Consent Orders, Non Compliance, Dismissal of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Consent Orders Non Compliance Dismissal of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Kanyiri Nduati

Applicant

Stewart Robert Wairumbi Thagichu

Respondent

Benjamin Mukiri Kimani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Compliance With Consent Orders and Dismissal of Application

  1. 1 Whether the parties complied with the directions and orders issued by consent on 29th October, 2024.
  2. 2 Whether the Notice of Motion Application dated 12th March, 2024, should be dismissed for non-compliance.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondents should be at liberty to execute the judgment and decree in Limuru SPM Civil Case No. 289 of 2020.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties, specifically the Applicant, had failed to comply with the directions and orders issued by consent on 29th October, 2024. The Applicant's counsel was absent and no explanation for non-compliance was provided. Given that the consent orders were time-bound and there was no compliance or representation from the Applicant, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the Notice of Motion Application dated 12th March, 2024, set aside the previous orders, and granted the Respondents liberty to execute the judgment and decree in Limuru SPM Civil Case No. 289 of 2020. The costs of the application were awarded to the Respondents.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for non-compliance with consent orders; liberty to execute granted to respondents

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion Application dated March 12, 2024, is dismissed.
  • Orders and directions issued on October 29, 2024, are set aside and vacated.