[2025] KEELRC 675 (KLR)
The court did not make a substantive determination on the merits of the motion for interim reliefs because the claimant withdrew the application before submissions were filed and considered. The withdrawal rendered the motion moot, and the only issue for the court was to mark the application as withdrawn and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELRC 675 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Hellen Nduhiu; Respondent: Brookhurst International School
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E025 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Motion
- Outcome
- Motion withdrawn with costs to the respondent.
- Judges
- S Radido
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Interlocutory Injunction, Employment Benefits, Mental Health in Employment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hellen Nduhiu
Applicant
Brookhurst International School
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to interim orders suspending her termination pending the hearing of the main suit.
- 2 Whether the claimant should be reinstated to her employment benefits, including her children's tuition, pending the suit.
- 3 Whether the respondent complied with section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007 before terminating the claimant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court did not make a substantive determination on the merits of the motion for interim reliefs because the claimant withdrew the application before submissions were filed and considered. The withdrawal rendered the motion moot, and the only issue for the court was to mark the application as withdrawn and determine the issue of costs. The court awarded costs to the respondent as the successful party in the withdrawn motion.
Court Disposition
Motion withdrawn with costs to the respondent.
Orders
- The Motion dated 15 January 2025 is marked as withdrawn with costs to the Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Nduhiu v Brookhurst International School (Cause E025 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 675 (KLR) (6 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELRC 675 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause E025 of 2025
S Radido, J
March 6, 2025
Between
Hellen Nduhiu
Claimant
and
Brookhurst International School
Respondent
Ruling
1. On or around 2 September 2022, a Director of Brookhurst International School (the Respondent) confirmed Hellen Nduhiu (the Claimant) as the Principal.
2. The Claimant did not last long in the position, and on 13 December 2024, the Director wrote to her to inform her it had decided to separate with her.
3. The Claimant was aggrieved, and she sued the Respondent on 16 January 2025, alleging unfair termination of employment and breach of contract.
4. At the same time, the Claimant filed a Motion seeking orders:i.…ii.…iii.That pending the hearing and final disposition of the main suit, the Honourable Court be pleased to issue the following orders:a.This Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order suspending the termination of the applicant.b.This Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order reinstating the applicant's benefits, including but not limited to the immediate resumption of schooling of the applicant's children.iv.That pending compliance with section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007, this Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order suspending the termination of the applicant's employment.v.That this Honourable Court do grant any other and further order as may be just and expedient and for the interest of justice.vi.That cost of this application be provided for
5. The primary grounds in support of the Motion were that the Respondent had unfairly terminated the Claimant’s contract despite being aware of her mental health status and, that part of the Claimant's benefits was free tuition, and one of her children was scheduled to sit her final examinations in May 2025.
6. The Court gave directions on the Motion on 17 January 2025 and 21 January 2025. The Court also urged the parties to attempt to compromise the Motion.
7. The Respondent filed a replying affidavit on 3 February 2025. In the affidavit, the Director of the Respondent accused the Claimant of absenteeism, poor performance and conduct contrary to the Code of Conduct.
8. The Director further deponed that since the Claimant’s contract had been terminated, her children could continue attending school upon payment of school fees.
9. On the Court directed the parties to file and exchange submissions.
10. Instead of filing submissions, the Claimant filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Motion dated 15 January 2025.
Orders 11. The Motion dated 15 January 2025 is marked as withdrawn with costs to the Respondent.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED AND SIGNED IN NAIROBI ON THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. RADIDO STEPHEN, MCIArbJUDGEAppearancesFor Claimant Elkana Mogaka & Associates AdvocatesFor Respondent M.D. Mwaura AdvocatesCourt Assistant Wangu