[2023] KECPT 844 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 844 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the affidavit of service filed by the Claimant/Respondent did not demonstrate that the process server made a reasonable number of attempts to serve the Respondent/Applicant in person before resorting to substituted service through an adult member of the family. This failure to comply with the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 844 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ndumberi Dairy Farmers’ Co-operative Society Limited; Respondent: Edin Njau Waruinge
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 46 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Judgment
Outcome
application allowed; interlocutory judgment set aside; leave to defend granted
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Setting Aside Judgment, Affidavit of Service
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Service of Process Setting Aside Judgment Affidavit of Service

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndumberi Dairy Farmers’ Co-operative Society Limited

Applicant

Edin Njau Waruinge

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent/Applicant was properly served with Summons to enter Appearance and Statement of Claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the affidavit of service filed by the Claimant/Respondent did not demonstrate that the process server made a reasonable number of attempts to serve the Respondent/Applicant in person before resorting to substituted service through an adult member of the family. This failure to comply with the requirements of Order 5 Rule 12 of the Civil Procedure Rules meant that proper service was not effected. Consequently, the interlocutory judgment entered against the Respondent/Applicant was irregular. In the interest of justice and guided by the principles set out in CMC Holdings Ltd v Nzioki, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to set aside the interlocutory judgment and...

Court Disposition

application allowed; interlocutory judgment set aside; leave to defend granted

Orders

  • The interlocutory judgment dated 8th July 2022 and all consequential orders are set aside.
  • The Respondent to file and serve Statements of Defence, Witness Statements and List of Documents within 14 days from the date of the ruling.