[2020] KEHC 7013 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 7013 (KLR)

The court found that, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the petitioner for robbery with violence was unconstitutional. The court exercised its discretion to resentence the petitioner, taking into account the gravity of the offences, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 7013 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Ndune Andrew Mbaji; Respondent: The Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 64 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Judgment
Outcome
death sentence lifted; petitioner resentenced to 27 years for robbery with violence and 15 years for rape, sentences to run concurrently from date of arrest.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Mandatory Death Sentence, Resentencing, Robbery With Violence, Rape, Penal Code Interpretation
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Mandatory Death Sentence Resentencing Robbery With Violence Rape Penal Code Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndune Andrew Mbaji

Petitioner

The Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner for robbery with violence is unconstitutional following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the petitioner upon resentencing for the offences of robbery with violence and rape.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the petitioner for robbery with violence was unconstitutional. The court exercised its discretion to resentence the petitioner, taking into account the gravity of the offences, the circumstances of the case, and the petitioner's submissions regarding his rehabilitation and family responsibilities. The court determined that a custodial sentence of 27 years for robbery with violence and 15 years for rape, to run concurrently from the date of arrest, was appropriate and proportionate to the offences committed. The death sentence was lifted and replaced with the new...

Court Disposition

death sentence lifted; petitioner resentenced to 27 years for robbery with violence and 15 years for rape, sentences to run concurrently from date of arrest.

Orders

  • In count number one, the death sentence is lifted and replaced with a term of 27 years imprisonment from the date of arrest.
  • For count number two, the trial court’s sentence of 15 years is confirmed.