[2024] KEHC 12264 (KLR)
The court found that the dispute at hand concerns the use and occupation of land, trespass, and compensation for rent arrears and mesne profits, which fall squarely within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as provided by Section 13 of the ELC Act. The High Court, therefore, lacks jurisdiction to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 12264 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Thomas Ndung'U; Respondent: Catherine Muthoni Gatere
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E321 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application for Review/variation of Security for Costs Order
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection allowed; appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court for further directions.
- Judges
- JN Mulwa
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Courts, Transfer of Proceedings, Security for Costs, Review of Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Ndung'U
Appellant
Catherine Muthoni Gatere
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application for Review/variation of Security for Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the appeal concerning land use, occupation, and related orders.
- 2 Whether the order for security for costs should be reviewed or varied to allow payment from a joint account.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the dispute at hand concerns the use and occupation of land, trespass, and compensation for rent arrears and mesne profits, which fall squarely within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as provided by Section 13 of the ELC Act. The High Court, therefore, lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. In accordance with established legal principles, particularly as articulated in Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lilian S' v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Limited, a court must down its tools once it determines it lacks jurisdiction. Consequently, the court allowed the preliminary objection and ordered the transfer of the appeal to the ELC for further directions, declining to...
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection allowed; appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court for further directions.
Orders
- The preliminary objection is allowed.
- The appeal is transferred to the Environment and Land Court for further directions on the motion dated 29/5/2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
Ndung'U v Gatere (Civil Appeal E321 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 12264 (KLR) (Civ) (15 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 12264 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil
Civil Appeal E321 of 2024
JN Mulwa, J
October 15, 2024
Between
Thomas Ndung'U
Appellant
and
Catherine Muthoni Gatere
Respondent
((Being an Appeal against the Ruling of the Honourable Lucy Njora (SPM) delivered on 1st February 2024 in MCELC E1621 OF 2020).)
Ruling
1. By a Notice of Motion dated 29/5/2024, the Appellant seeks an order that the order of the court dated 8/5/2024 be reviewed and/ or varied to order the sum of Kshs. 500,000/= be paid from the sum of Kshs. 7,000,000/= held in the Appellants joint account number 7500002401 with Housing Finance Company (HFC) Kenya Limited, upon grounds stated at is face and supporting affidavit he swore on the even date; principally stating that he is unable to raise the sum of Kshs. 500,000/= the court ordered him to deposit as security on 8/5/2024 as he is unemployed and cannot raise the same.
2. He proposes that the said sum be paid out of a joint account No. 7500002401 he hold with his former wife, the Respondent in this appeal, held at Housing Finance Company Ltd with a credit balance of Kshs.7,000,000/= pending hearing and determination of the appeal, which amount he says will be available at the conclusion of the appeal.
3. In opposition, the Respondent filed a notice of Preliminary Objection dated 30/7/2024 contending that this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this appeal as the dispute ought to be placed before the Environment and Land Court (ELC).
4. Two issues present themselves for determination:-i.on jurisdiction; andii.on review and or variation of the orders of 8/5/2024.
5. On jurisdiction, once a court finds itself without jurisdiction, it must down its tools as without it, all it does amounts to nothing. Therefore the issue ought to be dealt with in the first instance. See Owners of Motor Vessel “Lilian S” – Versus - Caltex Oil (Kenya) Limited (1989) IKLR dealt with a court, jurisdiction thus:-“Jurisdiction is everything. Without it, a court has no powers to make one more step. Where a court has no jurisdiction there would be no basis for a continuation of the proceedings pending other evidence. A court of law downs its tools in respect of the matter before it the moment it holds the opinion it is without jurisdiction…………where a court takes it upon itself to exercise jurisdiction which it does not possess, its decision amounts to nothing. Jurisdiction must be acquired before Judgement is given”.
6. To determine jurisdiction, the pleadings and cause of action in the trial court in MCELC E621 of 2020 must be perused and considered. I have done so, together with the judgement as well as the Memorandum of Appeal filed herein.Without a doubt, it is clear that the dispute concerns the use and occupation of the suit premises, trespass and compensation for rent arrears and mesne profits.
7. The trial magistrate in her judgment dated 23/1/2024 issued a mandatory injunction directing the Defendants, now the Appellants to pay all outstanding service charge, water and electricity before eviction of the defendants from the suit premises.
8. These are the orders, among others, that are subject of the appeal herein, and the motion before the court.It is therefore an appeal that ought to have been filed before the ELC that by dint of Section 13 of the ELC Act grants it jurisdiction to preside over land disputes as is the case herein.
9. For the going, having found that the appeal belongs to the ELC, this court downs its tools and exercises its jurisdiction to either dismiss the appeal for having been filed in a court without jurisdiction; or to order a transfer of the appeal to the ELC.
10. The Preliminary Objection is allowed and the appeal is transferred to the ELC for further directions on the motion dated 29/5/2024.
Orders accordingly.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN NAIROBI THIS 15THDAY OF OCTOBER 2024. JANET MULWAJUDGE