[2023] KEMC 63 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, was liable for the accident as pleaded by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's evidence, including medical reports and receipts, proved the injuries and special damages. The court applied established legal principles requiring special...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEMC 63 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Patrick Samuel Njoroge Ndungu; Defendant: Moses Starlin Maloba
- Court
- Magistrate's Court
- Court Station
- Chief Magistrate's Court (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 7553 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff.
- Judges
- JP Aduke
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Accidents, Negligence, Personal Injury, Damages Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Samuel Njoroge Ndungu
Plaintiff
Moses Starlin Maloba
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was liable in negligence for the road traffic accident that caused injury to the plaintiff.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff proved special damages as pleaded.
- 3 What quantum of general damages, special damages, and loss of earning capacity should be awarded.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, was liable for the accident as pleaded by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's evidence, including medical reports and receipts, proved the injuries and special damages. The court applied established legal principles requiring special damages to be pleaded and proved, and assessed general damages for pain and suffering based on comparable case law. The court also considered the plaintiff's loss of earning capacity due to the fracture sustained, awarding a sum in general damages despite the absence of documentary proof of prior earnings, relying on the nature of the plaintiff's work and medical evidence. The...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Orders
- General damages of KES 500,000 awarded to the plaintiff.
- Loss of earning capacity awarded at KES 100,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Ndungu v Maloba (Civil Suit 7553 of 2016) [2023] KEMC 63 (KLR) (14 March 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 63 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Chief Magistrate's Court (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil Suit 7553 of 2016
JP Aduke, SRM
March 14, 2023
Between
Patrick Samuel Njoroge Ndungu
Plaintiff
and
Moses Starlin Maloba
Defendant
Judgment
1. The Plaintiff filed this suit against the defendant after he sustained injuries following a road traffic accident on 3rd November 2013 along Nairobi-Naivasha Highway at Kinoo. In the plaint on record, the plaintiff avers he was a lawful pedestrian living his best life when the Defendant either acting as servant/agent/authorized driver of motor vehicle registration number KBE 856G negligently and carelessly drove the said motor vehicle and without due care caused it to lose control and knock down the Plaintiff who was crossing the road at a pedestrian crossway thereby causing the Plaintiff to suffer injuries.
2. The Plaintiff blames the Defendants and their agents/authorized servants for causing the said accident. The Plaintiff further avers that the said accident was solely caused by the negligence of the Defendants.
3. The particulars of injuries sustained by the Plaintiff are captured in para 4 of the Plaint while the particulars of alleged negligence are captured in para 4 of the Plaint. The Plaintiff prays for general damages for pain and suffering, loss of earning capacity, special damages, costs of the suit and interest at court rates.
4. Return of Service on Record shows that the defendants were served with the suit papers. Neither of the defendants entered appearance. As a result, judgment in default of appearance was entered against the Defendant. The suit proceeded to formal proof hearing. PW1, the plaintiff, adopted and relied on his pleadings and statements on record as his evidence in chief. Parties filed submissions. The issue for determination before this court is one:
1. Quontum 5. The Plaintiff prays for General Damages, loss of earning capacity, Special Damages, Costs of the Suit and any other relief. With respect to Special Damages, the Plaint prays for KES 291,241/- as captured in para 4 of the Plaint. I have seen receipts on record attesting to KES 4,000, KES 1000 and KES 12,000/-. It is settled principle that special damages must be pleaded and proved. I find that KES 17,000/- has been pleaded and proved and award the same.
6. With respect to general damages, I have considered all the submissions on record and the authorities annexed thereto. I have also considered all the exhibits on record. In particular, I have relied on the reasoning of the court in Samuel Kimani & Another vs Edward Otieno & Another [2017] eKLR where the court awarded general damages for comparable injuries. From the documents on record, the plaintiff in this instance suffered a fracture of the right leg when the accident happened. Taking into account that no amount of damages can restore the Plaintiff to what he was prior to the said accident, the rate of inflation and cost of living, I hereby award KES 500,000/- as general damages.
7. The plaintiff has pleaded for an award for loss of earning capacity. I have relied on the reasoning of the court in John Kipkemboi & Another vs Morris Kedolo [2019]Eklr and SJ vs Fransesco Di Nello & anor[2015]EKLR where the Court of Appeal stated as follows:“Claims under the heads of loss of future earnings and loss of earning capacity are distinctively different. Loss of income, which may be described as real actual loss is loss of future earnings. Loss of earning capacity may be defined as diminution in earning capacity. Loss of income or future earnings is compensated for real assessable loss which is proved by evidence. On the other hand, loss of earning capacity is compensated by an award in general damages, once proved.” The plaintiff herein, was a matatu driver prior to the accident. He has since suffered a fracture of the leg. The medical report on record confirms this. I have also seen a letter from the Plaintiff’s employer but no proof of money earned prior to the said accident. Taking into account all the above and the nature of work the plaintiff used to do, I award KES 100,000/- as general damages on account of loss of earning capacity.
8. In conclusion, I enter judgement in favour of the plaintiff as follows:1. General damages KES 500,000/-2. Loss of earning capacity KES 100,000/3. Special damages KES 17,000/-4. Costs of the suit.5. Interest on 1, 2 and 4 above at court rates.
9. The Plaintiff shall have costs in this suit and interests at court rates from the date of this judgement until payment in full.
JUDGEMENT SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY IN NAIROBI THIS 14TH MARCH 2023 IN THE ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES AT 1507HRS.ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATE