[2024] KEHC 1466 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 1466 (KLR)

The court found that the application for leave to appeal out of time was made without inordinate delay, as the lapse between judgment and the application was not excessive. The court emphasized the constitutional imperative to facilitate fair hearing and substantive justice, holding that denying the extension would...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 1466 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fredrick Mwenda Ndururu; Applicant: Samuel Mwangi Njoroge; Respondent: John Waweru Mukuria alias John Waweru Mukeri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E040 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application allowed in part; leave to appeal out of time granted; stay of execution granted on condition.
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Extension of Time, Security for Decretal Sum
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Extension of Time Security for Decretal Sum

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fredrick Mwenda Ndururu

Applicant

Samuel Mwangi Njoroge

Applicant

John Waweru Mukuria alias John Waweru Mukeri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of the Principal Magistrate’s Court.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the judgment and decree should be granted pending appeal.
  3. 3 What conditions, if any, should be imposed for the grant of stay of execution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to appeal out of time was made without inordinate delay, as the lapse between judgment and the application was not excessive. The court emphasized the constitutional imperative to facilitate fair hearing and substantive justice, holding that denying the extension would unjustly bar the applicants from appellate recourse. Regarding stay of execution, the court determined that the applicants had satisfied the requirements under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules: the application was timely, the applicants risked substantial loss if the decretal sum was paid and not recoverable, and they had offered security. However, given the money...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; leave to appeal out of time granted; stay of execution granted on condition.

Orders

  • Time to file appeal enlarged; appeal to be filed within 14 days from the date of ruling.
  • Stay of execution of judgment or decree granted pending determination of appeal, provided the applicant pays the respondent Kshs. 100,000 within 45 days.