[2024] KEELC 4101 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 4101 (KLR)

The court found that since execution of the decree was already underway and judgment had been delivered four months prior, any further delay in determining the application for stay would render the process academic. The applicants had not acted with promptness, but in the interests of justice and to avoid rendering...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 4101 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Grace Nduta; Plaintiff: Agnes Wanjiku; Plaintiff: Lucy Wambui; Plaintiff: Ngando Harambee Women Group; Defendant: Hannah Nduta Mukabi; Defendant: Eliud Mbuthi Kamau
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 1285 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of judgment allowed with conditions.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Judgment Enforcement, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Stay of Execution Judgment Enforcement Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grace Nduta

Plaintiff

Agnes Wanjiku

Plaintiff

Lucy Wambui

Plaintiff

Ngando Harambee Women Group

Plaintiff

Hannah Nduta Mukabi

Defendant

Eliud Mbuthi Kamau

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether to grant a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay is merited given the lapse of time since judgment.
  3. 3 Whether the prosecution of the application would be rendered academic if not determined promptly.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since execution of the decree was already underway and judgment had been delivered four months prior, any further delay in determining the application for stay would render the process academic. The applicants had not acted with promptness, but in the interests of justice and to avoid rendering the appeal nugatory, the court granted a stay of judgment for 60 days from the date of the ruling. The applicants were ordered to pay the costs of the application, and the file was marked as closed.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of judgment allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • A stay of the judgment is granted for 60 days from May 15, 2024.
  • Applicants to pay costs of the application.