[2022] KEELC 1119 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1119 (KLR)

The court found that the official reports by the County Surveyor and Land Registrar, which were consistent with each other and supported by cadastral maps, concluded that the Plaintiff's claimed land did not form part of parcel No. NORTH MUGIRANGO/BOKEIRA II/432 and that the Plaintiff had encroached on a public...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1119 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Nelson Anyoka Nyaema; Defendant: The County Government of Nyamira; Defendant: The Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 45 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Interlocutory Ruling on Expert Reports and Directions for Cross Examination
Outcome
Interlocutory directions issued; no final orders on merits.
Judges
CM Kamau
Legal Topics
Land Boundaries, Public Land Encroachment, Survey Reports, Eviction Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Boundaries Public Land Encroachment Survey Reports Eviction Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nelson Anyoka Nyaema

Plaintiff

The County Government of Nyamira

Defendant

The Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Dispute / Interlocutory Ruling on Expert Reports and Directions for Cross Examination

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Defendant unlawfully occupied the Plaintiff's parcel No. NORTH MUGIRANGO/BOKEIRA II/432.
  2. 2 Whether the official survey and Land Registrar reports or the Plaintiff's private survey report should be relied upon to determine boundaries.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to eviction and permanent injunction orders against the Defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the official reports by the County Surveyor and Land Registrar, which were consistent with each other and supported by cadastral maps, concluded that the Plaintiff's claimed land did not form part of parcel No. NORTH MUGIRANGO/BOKEIRA II/432 and that the Plaintiff had encroached on a public road. The Plaintiff's private surveyor report was found wanting for lack of reference to official maps. Given the conflicting reports, the court determined that cross-examination of the makers of the reports was necessary to resolve the evidentiary conflict and directed that both the Land Registrar and County Surveyor appear for cross-examination, after which parties would give...

Court Disposition

Interlocutory directions issued; no final orders on merits.

Orders

  • The Land Registrar and County Surveyor to appear in court for cross-examination on their respective reports on 22/03/2022.
  • Parties to give their evidence on the same day.