[2018] KEELRC 2426 (KLR)
The court found that both Cause No. 2189 of 2017 and Cause No. 673 of 2017 arose from the same cause of action—summary dismissal of the Claimant on 25 April 2016. The only difference was the legal representation. The court held that presenting two different causes on the same cause of action is an abuse of the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 2426 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Nelson Mandela Ingosi; Respondent: Nacico Sacco Society Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 2189 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out
- Outcome
- Statement of Claim struck out for abuse of court process; costs awarded to Respondent.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Summary Dismissal, Abuse of Court Process, Duplicity of Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nelson Mandela Ingosi
Claimant
Nacico Sacco Society Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the filing of two separate causes based on the same cause of action constitutes an abuse of court process.
- 2 Whether the Statement of Claim in Cause No. 2189 of 2017 should be struck out due to duplicity.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both Cause No. 2189 of 2017 and Cause No. 673 of 2017 arose from the same cause of action—summary dismissal of the Claimant on 25 April 2016. The only difference was the legal representation. The court held that presenting two different causes on the same cause of action is an abuse of the court process. Therefore, the Statement of Claim in Cause No. 2189 of 2017 was struck out to prevent duplicity and uphold the integrity of judicial proceedings.
Court Disposition
Statement of Claim struck out for abuse of court process; costs awarded to Respondent.
Orders
- The Statement of Claim filed in Court on 3 November 2017 is hereby struck out.
- The Claimant to meet the Respondent’s costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 2189 OF 2017
NELSON MANDELA INGOSI..........................................CLAIMANT
v
NACICO SACCO SOCIETY LTD...............................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. On 3 November 2017, Nelson Mandela Ingosi through the Banking Insurance and Finance Union (Union) instituted legal proceedings against Nacico Sacco Society Ltd (Respondent) and he stated the Issue in Dispute as wrongful/unfair summary dismissal from employment of Nelson Mandela Ingosi.
2. Upon service of Notice of Summons and the Statement of Claim, the Respondent filed a Response on 22 November 2017 through Modi & Co Advocates.
3. On 9 January 2018, the Respondent moved Court seeking
1. THAT, the suit herein be struck out and/or dismissed with costs.
2. THAT, the costs of the application be provided for.
4. When the application was placed before Court on 25 January 2018, the Union sought for time to file a response and the Court gave it up to 26 January 2018. On that date, hearing was rescheduled to 1 February 2018.
5. The Union did not file any response to the application as directed and when it came up for inter partes hearing on 1 February 2018, it was not represented.
6. Because the date had been scheduled in the presence of the General Secretary of the Union, the Court allowed the Respondent to prosecute the application.
7. The main ground presented by the Respondent in seeking the striking out of the Statement of Claim was that there was pending Nairobi Cause No. 673 of 2017, Nelson Mandela Ingosi v Nacico Co-Operative Savings & Credit Society Ltd in which the cause of action was outlined as unlawful summary dismissal on 25 April 2016.
8. In the instant Cause, the Union has set out the cause of action as summary dismissal on 25 April 2016.
9. It is obvious that there are two Causes arising out of the summary dismissal of the Claimant on 25 April 2016, the only difference being that in Cause No. 673 of 2017, Nelson Mandela Ingosi v Nacico Co-Operative Savings & Credit Society Ltd, the Claimant presented the Cause through Matheka & Oketch Advocates.
10. In the view of the Court, presenting two different Causes on the same cause of action is an abuse of the Court process.
11. The Court consequently upholds the application dated 9 January 2018 and orders
(a) The Statement of Claim filed in Court on 3 November 2017 is hereby struck out.
(b) The Claimant to meet the Respondent’s costs.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 2nd day of March 2018.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Munoru, General Secretary, Banking Insurance & Finance Union (K)
For Respondent Mr. Modi instructed by Modi & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Lindsey