[2019] KESDT 73 (KLR)

[2019] KESDT 73 (KLR)

The Tribunal declined to grant the temporary injunction and conservatory orders sought by the Claimant. It reasoned that substantial justice would be better served by allowing the elections to proceed as scheduled, given the time and resources already expended and the interests of the wider community. The Tribunal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KESDT 73 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nelson Mbaja Amendi; Respondent: AFC Leopards Sports Club; Respondent: Sports Registrar; Respondent: Daniel A. Mule; Respondent: Oscar Igaidi; Respondent: Oliver Napali; Respondent: Shikanda Daniel Akala; Respondent: Namai Ronald Mukoya; Respondent: Oliver Shikuku; Respondent: Choge Maurice Chichi
Court
Sports Disputes Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 10 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Conservatory Orders
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Sports Elections, Injunctive Relief, Conservatory Orders
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Sports Elections Injunctive Relief Conservatory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nelson Mbaja Amendi

Applicant

AFC Leopards Sports Club

Respondent

Sports Registrar

Respondent

Daniel A. Mule

Respondent

Oscar Igaidi

Respondent

Oliver Napali

Respondent

Shikanda Daniel Akala

Respondent

Namai Ronald Mukoya

Respondent

Oliver Shikuku

Respondent

Choge Maurice Chichi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal should grant a temporary injunction to stop the elections scheduled for 23rd June 2019.
  2. 2 Whether conservatory orders should be issued to stay the implementation of the 1st Respondent's Constitution adopted in June 2017.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal declined to grant the temporary injunction and conservatory orders sought by the Claimant. It reasoned that substantial justice would be better served by allowing the elections to proceed as scheduled, given the time and resources already expended and the interests of the wider community. The Tribunal noted that the Claimant retains the right to challenge the conduct or outcome of the elections by way of appeal within 30 days, as provided under the Sports Registrar Regulations, 2016. Furthermore, the Tribunal found no material evidence to justify staying the implementation of the 1st Respondent's Constitution, as the Claimant had not demonstrated how it would negatively...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Claimant's prayers for a temporary injunction barring the elections and a conservatory order staying the implementation of the 1st Respondent's Constitution are declined.
  • The matter shall be mentioned before the Tribunal for further directions on 2nd July 2019 when the 1st Respondent shall present results of the election together with the election report.