[2021] KEELRC 1065 (KLR)
The court found that the Respondent was given multiple opportunities to participate in the proceedings and comply with procedural orders but failed to do so without adequate justification. The explanations provided, including the alleged missing court file and Covid-19 disruptions, were unsubstantiated. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 1065 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nelson Omila Saunya; Respondent: Ideal Security Services Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 2243 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Procedural Non Compliance, Right to Be Heard
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nelson Omila Saunya
Applicant
Ideal Security Services Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent has shown sufficient cause to set aside the ex parte judgment entered against it.
- 2 Whether procedural failures by the Respondent can be excused due to alleged missing court file and Covid-19 disruptions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Respondent was given multiple opportunities to participate in the proceedings and comply with procedural orders but failed to do so without adequate justification. The explanations provided, including the alleged missing court file and Covid-19 disruptions, were unsubstantiated. The court emphasized that parties must act diligently and cannot rely on generic excuses to avoid the consequences of their inaction. As such, there was no sufficient cause to set aside the ex parte judgment, and the application was declined.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The Application filed by the Respondent, dated 21st April 2021 is declined.
- Costs to the Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NUMBER 2243 OF 2017
BETWEEN
NELSON OMILA SAUNYA .........................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
IDEAL SECURITY SERVICES LIMITED............................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Judgment was entered in favour of the Claimant on 9th April 2021.
2. This followed an ex parte hearing on 21st January 2021.
3. The record indicates that Summons issued against the Respondent in 2017. There was no Appearance entered within the prescribed time. Pre-trial conferencing took place on 16th July 2019, when the Respondent’s Counsel asked for time to file Response. The Court granted the Respondent 7 days to comply. There was no compliance. The matter was mentioned on 3rd December 2019 before the Hon. Principal Judge Maureen Onyango. Both Parties were represented. The Respondent still had not complied. The Principal Judge certified the case ready for hearing undefended. The Respondent did not apply to have the orders made by the Principal Judge set aside. On 6th November 2020, the Court Deputy Registrar fixed the matter for formal proof.
4. The Respondent has against this background, filed an Application dated 21st April 2021, asking the Court to set aside ex parte Judgment, and reopen the hearing. The Application is supported by an Affidavit sworn by Respondent’s Counsel, Benard Obae, on 21st April 2021. The Respondent alleges that the Court File was missing and Pleadings could not be filed within the given time. It also alleges, that it was hampered by Covid-19, which has stifled the operations of the Court. It is submitted that there are triable issues warranting grant of the orders sought.
5. Parties agreed before the Deputy Registrar on 11th May 2021, to have the Application considered and determined on the strength of Written Submissions. They confirmed filing and exchange of Submissions at the last virtual mention, on 11th June 2021. Ruling was reserved for 23rd September 2021. It has however been readied well in advance of this date, and the Court has no reason to keep it pending. It has directed that the Registry issues notices to the Parties, for delivery on the date indicated below.
6. The Court does not think, based on the record as summarized above, that there is good ground shown by the Respondent, to interfere with the Judgment on record. Parties were represented in Court when various procedural orders issued. The Respondent did not comply with those orders. Covid-19 should not be blamed for every failure by some litigants, occurring in the corridors of justice. There is no evidence that the file was at any one time, irretraceable. The Deputy Registrar would have been engaged by the Respondent, if the file was missing. The Court is satisfied that the Respondent was granted sufficient time to participate in the proceedings, but completely rejected that opportunity.
IT IS ORDERED: -
a. The Application filed by the Respondent, dated 21st April 2021 is declined.
b. Costs to the Claimant.
Dated, signed and released to the Parties electronically, at Chaka, Nyeri County, under Ministry of Health and Judiciary Covid-19 Guidelines, this 20th August 2021.
James Rika
Judge