[2025] KEHC 4425 (KLR)
The court found that while the accused had been unable to meet the initial bond conditions, this alone did not constitute sufficient grounds to review the bond terms. The court emphasized that the primary objective of bail or bond is to secure the accused’s attendance at trial, and that bond terms must balance the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 4425 (KLR)
- Parties
- Defendant: Samson Morongo Nesco; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kibera
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 53 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Review Application
- Outcome
- application for bond review dismissed
- Judges
- DR Kavedza
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Murder Charges, Pretrial Release, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samson Morongo Nesco
Defendant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bond terms imposed on the accused are excessive or unreasonable in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether there has been a material change in circumstances warranting review of the bond terms.
- 3 Whether the accused is a flight risk or likely to abscond if bond terms are varied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the accused had been unable to meet the initial bond conditions, this alone did not constitute sufficient grounds to review the bond terms. The court emphasized that the primary objective of bail or bond is to secure the accused’s attendance at trial, and that bond terms must balance the right to reasonable bail with the need to ensure the accused does not abscond. The seriousness of the charge and the pre-bail report were considered, and the court concluded that the bond terms previously set were appropriate and not excessive in the circumstances. There was no material change in circumstances justifying interference with the earlier decision, and the...
Court Disposition
application for bond review dismissed
Orders
- The application for bond review is dismissed.
- The bond terms of Ksh. 1,000,000 with one surety remain in force.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Nesco v Republic (Criminal Case 53 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 4425 (KLR) (31 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 4425 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kibera
Criminal Case 53 of 2023
DR Kavedza, J
March 31, 2025
Between
Samson Morongo Nesco
Accused
and
Republic
Prosecutor
Ruling
1. The accused person Samson Morongo Nesco was charged with the offence of Murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the penal code cap 63 Laws of Kenya. The particulars are that on the 17th July at around 2100hours at Mitumba estate near Wilson Airport within Nairobi County jointly with others not before court murdered Stephen Mkangi Mwaisuga.
2. The accused applied for bail, and by a ruling dated 23rd January 2020, the trial judge granted bond of Ksh. 1,000,000/= with one surety of the same amount. However, the accused has been unable to raise the required sum.
3. Counsel for the accused, Ms. Odembo, made an oral application for bond review, requesting the court to set reasonable terms. She argued that the accused is a family man with an eight-year-old daughter and that his wife’s presence in court demonstrated he is not a flight risk.
4. The application was strongly opposed by Ms. Timoi for the State.
5. I have considered the application, the arguments made in support of the application, and the applicable law. For consideration is whether the orders sought should be reviewed.
6. In granting bail, the court must also ensure that bail or bond terms must not be excessive or unreasonable and should not be far greater than what is necessary to ensure or guarantee the accused person's appearance before the court. Where this is the case, it would be tantamount to a denial of bail, a right that is enshrined in the Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code as outlined above. This position was expounded in the case of Taiko Kitende Muinya [2010] e-KLR.
7. The Bail and Bond Policy Guidelines on page 9 paragraph 3. 1. (d) underpins the right to reasonable Bail and Bond terms. Conversely, bail or bond amounts should not be so low that the accused person would be enticed into forfeiting the bail or bond amount and fleeing. Secondly, bail or bond conditions should be appropriate to the offence committed and consider the personal circumstances of the accused person. In the circumstances, what is reasonable will be determined by reference to the facts and circumstances prevailing in each case. The above position has been enunciated in various decisions by the courts as in the case of Andrew Young Otieno vs. Republic (2017) eKLR.
8. In this case, the court deemed it appropriate to grant the accused bond. It is evident that the accused has been unable to meet the bond conditions initially imposed, which constitutes a material change in circumstances. The primary objective of bail or bond is to secure the accused’s attendance at trial. However, bond terms should not be so low that maybe an incentive for the accused to abscond. In determining the appropriate bond conditions, the court took into account the pre-bail report on record and the seriousness of the charges. Consequently, the accused was granted bond in the sum of Kshs. 1,000,000/= in exercise of its discretion.
9. The upshot of the above analysis is that I decline to interfere with the decision of this court and dismiss the application for bond review.Orders accordingly.
RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 31STDAY OF MARCH 2025D. KAVEDZAJUDGEIn the presence of:Ms. Maina for the StateMs. Odembo for the AccusedTonny Court Assistant