[2019] KEHC 11989 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11989 (KLR)

The court found that the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner was unconstitutional, relying on the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic [2017] eKLR, which declared the mandatory nature of the death penalty under Section 204 of the Penal Code unconstitutional. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 11989 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Newton Njoroge; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 54 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
death sentence set aside; petitioner resentenced to 30 years imprisonment from date of arrest
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Mandatory Death Sentence, Right to Fair Trial, Mitigation of Sentence, Cruel Inhuman Degrading Punishment
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Mandatory Death Sentence Right to Fair Trial Mitigation of Sentence Cruel Inhuman Degrading Punishment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Newton Njoroge

Appellant

Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for murder under Section 204 of the Penal Code is unconstitutional.
  2. 2 Whether the failure to consider the petitioner's mitigation infringed his constitutional rights under Articles 25 and 29 of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner was unconstitutional, relying on the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic [2017] eKLR, which declared the mandatory nature of the death penalty under Section 204 of the Penal Code unconstitutional. The court held that sentencing must allow for consideration of mitigation and individual circumstances to avoid infringing constitutional rights. Consequently, the court set aside the death sentence and resentenced the petitioner to a term of thirty years' imprisonment from the date of arrest, emphasizing the need for punishment that reflects both the gravity of the offence and the...

Court Disposition

death sentence set aside; petitioner resentenced to 30 years imprisonment from date of arrest

Orders

  • The death sentence imposed on the petitioner is set aside.
  • The petitioner is sentenced to thirty (30) years imprisonment from the date of arrest.