[2017] KEHC 4899 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 4899 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had made considerable and genuine efforts to serve the 1st defendant, including inquiries at the company registry, but was unable to do so due to the absence of any records or address. Recognizing the fairness and justice in allowing the plaintiff further opportunity to serve the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 4899 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: NFL Trading Company Limited; Defendant: Alkasons Transporters Limited; Defendant: First Assurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 115 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Extend Validity of Summons
Outcome
application granted
Judges
LM Njuguna
Legal Topics
Service of Summons, Extension of Time, Validity of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Service of Summons Extension of Time Validity of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NFL Trading Company Limited

Plaintiff

Alkasons Transporters Limited

Defendant

First Assurance Company Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Extend Validity of Summons

  1. 1 Whether the court should extend the validity of summons to enter appearance against the 1st defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff has demonstrated sufficient effort to serve the 1st defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had made considerable and genuine efforts to serve the 1st defendant, including inquiries at the company registry, but was unable to do so due to the absence of any records or address. Recognizing the fairness and justice in allowing the plaintiff further opportunity to serve the summons, the court exercised its discretion to extend the validity of the summons for twelve months. The extension was deemed necessary to ensure that the 1st defendant is properly served and accorded an opportunity to respond to the suit, in line with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Summons to enter appearance against the 1st defendant are hereby extended for twelve (12) months.