[2025] KECPT 321 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 321 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had established his entitlement to a refund of Kshs 167,315.63 by producing uncontroverted evidence of his membership and deposits. The Respondent's reliance on the AGM resolution to suspend refunds was not supported by evidence that the resolution was still in force at the time...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 321 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Chege George Ng'ang'a; Respondent: Metropolitan Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 166/E257 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the applicant
Judges
Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw
Legal Topics
Sacco Refunds, Member Withdrawal, Contractual Obligations, By Laws Interpretation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Sacco Refunds Member Withdrawal Contractual Obligations By Laws Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chege George Ng'ang'a

Applicant

Metropolitan Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of Kshs 167,315.63 upon withdrawal from the Respondent Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent's AGM resolution to suspend refunds for two years is binding and enforceable against the Claimant.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent's financial instability justifies withholding the Claimant's deposits.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had established his entitlement to a refund of Kshs 167,315.63 by producing uncontroverted evidence of his membership and deposits. The Respondent's reliance on the AGM resolution to suspend refunds was not supported by evidence that the resolution was still in force at the time of judgment, nor did the Respondent demonstrate that the Claimant had any outstanding liabilities. The Tribunal held that financial instability is not a valid legal ground to withhold the Claimant's deposits, and the Sacco's by-laws provide for withdrawal and refunds. Accordingly, judgment was entered in favour of the Claimant for the full amount claimed, plus costs and interest.

Court Disposition

judgment for the applicant

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant for Kshs 167,315.63.
  • The Respondent shall pay costs of the suit to the Claimant.