[2019] KEELC 4933 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff, as the registered proprietor of Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618, holds an indefeasible title under Section 26 of the Land Registration Act. The defendants failed to adduce any evidence of adverse possession or to demonstrate that the plaintiff's title was acquired through fraud,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 4933 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ng’ang’a Wainaina; Defendant: Hamisi Bwana; Defendant: Mutua Kasyuma; Defendant: Peter Maingi; Defendant: Musandi Wambua
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 364 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's suit allowed in full.
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Trespass to Land, Title Registration, Eviction, Injunctive Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ng’ang’a Wainaina
Plaintiff
Hamisi Bwana
Defendant
Mutua Kasyuma
Defendant
Peter Maingi
Defendant
Musandi Wambua
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the absolute and indefeasible owner of Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618.
- 2 Whether the defendants are trespassers on the suit land.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to orders of eviction and permanent injunction against the defendants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff, as the registered proprietor of Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618, holds an indefeasible title under Section 26 of the Land Registration Act. The defendants failed to adduce any evidence of adverse possession or to demonstrate that the plaintiff's title was acquired through fraud, misrepresentation, or illegality. The defendants' mere assertion of long-term occupation, unsupported by evidence and not meeting the statutory threshold for adverse possession, could not defeat the plaintiff's registered title. Consequently, the court declared the defendants trespassers and granted the plaintiff's prayers for eviction, a permanent injunction, and costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's suit allowed in full.
Orders
- Declaration that the defendants are trespassers on Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618.
- Defendants, their family members, or anyone deriving rights from them to be evicted from Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618 under police supervision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MACHAKOS
ELC. CASE NO. 364 OF 2012
NG’ANG’A WAINAINA.....................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
HAMISI BWANA......................................................1ST DEFENDANT
MUTUA KASYUMA................................................2ND DEFENDANT
PETER MAINGI.......................................................3RD DEFENDANT
MUSANDI WAMBUA..............................................4TH DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. In the Plaint dated 28th September, 2012, the Plaintiff averred that he is the registered proprietor of a parcel of land known as Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618 measuring 4. 92 Ha (the suit land); that in the year 2011, the Defendants entered upon the suit land and built temporary structures thereon and that the Defendants should be evicted from the suit land.
2. The Defendants filed a Defence through the firm of J.T. Nzioki and Co. Advocates in which they averred that they settled on the suit land twenty (20) years ago and that it is the Plaintiff who started interfering with their peacefully occupation of the land in the year 2012.
3. Although the Defendants’ advocates were served with the hearing notice for 17th May, 2018, they did not turn up when the matter came up for hearing . The hearing proceeded on the said date in their absence.
4. In his evidence, the Plaintiff, PW1, informed the court that before being issued with a Title Deed to the suit land, the Defendants had trespassed on the suit land and constructed illegal structures thereon; that despite seeking the intervention of the District Officer, the Defendants have refused to vacate the suit land and that his claim should be allowed.
5. The Plaintiff produced in evidence the Title Deed for Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618. The said Title Deed shows that the Plaintiff became the registered owner of the land on 19th January, 2012.
6. As correctly submitted by the Plaintiff’s advocate, under Section 26 of the Land Registration Act, a Certificate of Title issued by the Registrar shall be taken by all courts as prima facie evidence that the person named as proprietor of the land is the absolute and indefeasible owner. Such a title can only be defeated on the ground of fraud or misrepresentation, or where the Certificate of Title has been acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme.
7. In light of the above provision of the law, the Plaintiff is entitled, by virtue of being the registered proprietor of the suit land, to the use of the said land. The Defendants did not call any evidence to show that they have been in use and occupation of the suit land for more than twelve (12) years or that the Plaintiff’s suit is time barred.
8. For those reasons, I allow the Plaintiff’s Plaint dated 28th September, 2012 as follows:
a. A declaration that the Defendants herein are trespassers on parcel of land known as Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618.
b. An order be and is hereby issued that the Defendants, their family members or any one purporting to derive right of entry or re-entry from them be evicted from all that parcel of land known as Title No. Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618 with the supervision of, and/or enforcement by, the Officer Commanding Station, Yatta Police Station.
c. A permanent injunction be and is hereby issued restraining the Defendants, by themselves, their servants, agents, family members or any one purporting to derive right of entry or re-entry from them or otherwise howsoever from entering, encroaching upon, cultivating, cutting down trees, selling, transferring, alienating, disposing, developing, committing any acts of waste or in any other way whatsoever interfering with the land comprised in Title No. Ndalani/Ndalani Block 1/1618.
d. Costs of the suit to be paid by the Defendants.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED IN MACHAKOS THIS 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019.
O.A. ANGOTE
JUDGE