[2025] KECA 358 (KLR)

[2025] KECA 358 (KLR)

The Court held that the application for substitution and revival of the abated appeal was fatally defective because it was filed by the advocate, Karweru & Co. Advocates, in their own name and supported by an affidavit sworn by the advocate, rather than by the party with a legal interest in the appeal. Rule 102(3)...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECA 358 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alice Wangui Ngari; Respondent: Stephen Maina Murithi (Deceased) Substituted by Wanjira Ngari; Respondent: Patrick Maina Muriithi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) 140 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Substitution and Revival of Abated Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the interested party (intended substitute) Patrick Muriithi.
Judges
W Karanja
Legal Topics
Substitution of Parties, Abatement of Appeal, Revival of Appeal, Legal Representative, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Substitution of Parties Abatement of Appeal Revival of Appeal Legal Representative Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice Wangui Ngari

Applicant

Stephen Maina Murithi (Deceased) Substituted by Wanjira Ngari

Respondent

Patrick Maina Muriithi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Substitution and Revival of Abated Appeal

  1. 1 Whether an advocate can file an application for substitution and revival of an abated appeal in their own name instead of the party's name.
  2. 2 Whether the requirements under Rule 102(3) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 for revival of an abated appeal were met in this case.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the application for substitution and revival of the abated appeal was fatally defective because it was filed by the advocate, Karweru & Co. Advocates, in their own name and supported by an affidavit sworn by the advocate, rather than by the party with a legal interest in the appeal. Rule 102(3) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 clearly stipulates that only a person claiming to be the legal representative of a deceased party or an interested party may apply for revival of an abated appeal. The Court emphasized that counsel, regardless of their familiarity with the matter, cannot be considered an intended party and cannot undertake this procedural step on behalf of the...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs to the interested party (intended substitute) Patrick Muriithi.

Orders

  • The application for substitution and revival of the abated appeal is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the interested party (intended substitute) Patrick Muriithi.