[2024] KEHC 6031 (KLR)
The court found that while the applicant pleaded guilty and exhibited exemplary behaviour in prison, he was not a first offender, having previously served a probation sentence and reoffended during that period. Although the original sentence of seven years was within the statutory maximum, the court considered it...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 6031 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Murungu Maina Ngechu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E037 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Criminal Revision Application
- Outcome
- sentence revised and reduced
- Judges
- MA Odero
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Review, Threat to Kill, Plea of Guilty, Recidivism, Revision Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Murungu Maina Ngechu
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Criminal Revision Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of seven years imprisonment imposed on the applicant for the offence of threat to kill was excessive and should be revised.
- 2 Whether the applicant's guilty plea and conduct in prison warranted a reduction of sentence.
- 3 Whether the applicant's status as a repeat offender affected the appropriateness of a non-custodial or reduced sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the applicant pleaded guilty and exhibited exemplary behaviour in prison, he was not a first offender, having previously served a probation sentence and reoffended during that period. Although the original sentence of seven years was within the statutory maximum, the court considered it excessive in the circumstances. The court exercised its revisionary jurisdiction to set aside the seven-year sentence and substituted it with a four-year term of imprisonment, to run from the date of the original sentence. The court balanced the applicant's mitigation with the aggravating factor of recidivism and the seriousness of the offence, particularly as it was committed...
Court Disposition
sentence revised and reduced
Orders
- The seven-year sentence imposed by the trial court is set aside.
- The applicant is sentenced to four years imprisonment, to run from the date of the original sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Ngechu v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E037 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 6031 (KLR) (27 May 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6031 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nyeri
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E037 of 2023
MA Odero, J
May 27, 2024
Between
Murungu Maina Ngechu
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. Before this court is an Criminal Revision Application dated 8th May, 2023 filed by the applicant Murungu Maina Ngechu seeking review of his sentence.
2. The Hon. DPP opposed the application.
Background 3. The Applicant herein had been charged with the offence of threat to killcontrary to Section 223 (1) of the Penal Code Cap 63 Laws of Kenya. The facts were that on 6th May, 2022 at Keriko Village Tetu Sub-County in Nyeri County, the Applicant while armed with a Panga threatened to kill Muthoni Wambui Ngechu (his mother).
4. Initially the Applicant entered a plea of Not Guilty to the charge. The trial commenced in the lower court on 18th August, 2022 on which date the complainant tendered her evidence.
5. Thereafter on 17th October, 2022 the Applicant changed his plea to one of Guilty. The facts were read out and the Applicant maintained his plea of Guilty.
6. On 10th November, 2023 the learned trial magistrate sentenced the Applicant to serve seven (7) years imprisonment with no option of a fine. The Applicant has now been in prison for one (1) year and two (2) months.
Analysis And Determination 7. The power of the High Court to review sentences is provided by Section 362 of the Penal Code which provides as follows:-“The High Court may call for and examine the record of any criminal proceedings before any subordinate court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness legality, or propriety of any finding, sentence or order recorded or passed and as to the regularity of any proceedings in any such subordinate court.”
8. The orders which the court may make upon revision are provided for under Section 364 of the Penal Code.
9. Having considered this application for review, I note that the Applicant opted to plead guilty thus saving the court from the rigors of a full trial. I have also perused and put into consideration the recommendation reports dated 8th February, 2024 and 30th October, 2023 prepared by the officer in charge Nyeri Main Prison which indicates that the Applicant has been of exemplary behaviour whilst in prison.
10. However I do note that the complainant was the mother of the Applicant and I further note that the Applicant was not a first offender. He had earlier served a sentence of two (2) years’ probation and whilst out on probation committed this current offence. As such the Applicant already under benefit of a non-custodial sentence proceeded to offend again.
11. The offence with which the Applicant was charged is a Felony with a Maximum sentence of ten (10) years imprisonment.
12. It is my considered opinion that the sentence of seven (7) years though lawful was a tad excessive. In the circumstances I set aside the seven (7) year sentence imposed by the trial court and in its place I substitute a sentence of four (4) years imprisonment. The sentence to run from the date the Applicant was first sentenced by the trial court. It is so ordered.
DATED IN NYERI THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2024. …………………………………………MAUREEN A. ODEROJUDGE