[2025] KECA 491 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient explanation for the delay, namely the late furnishing of proceedings and judgment, and that the respondent did not oppose the application given the gravity of the sentence. The court exercised its discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 491 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Gilbert Kipkurui Ng'eno; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E010 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- PM Gachoka
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Criminal Appeals, Conviction and Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gilbert Kipkurui Ng'eno
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence of the High Court.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate and if it is excusable under the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient explanation for the delay, namely the late furnishing of proceedings and judgment, and that the respondent did not oppose the application given the gravity of the sentence. The court exercised its discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 and allowed the application for extension of time, enabling the applicant to file his notice of appeal and record of appeal within the prescribed periods.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order.
- The record of appeal shall be filed and served within 45 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Ng'eno v Republic (Criminal Application E010 of 2025) [2025] KECA 491 (KLR) (7 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 491 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Criminal Application E010 of 2025
PM Gachoka, JA
March 7, 2025
Between
Gilbert Kipkurui Ng'eno
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(An application for leave to appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Kericho (Ongeri, J. delivered on 14th October 2022 in HCCRA No. 33 of 2019 Criminal Appeal 33 of 2019 )
Ruling
1. Before me is the Notice of Motion dated 23rd January 2025. The applicant seeks leave of this Court to appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence of the Kericho High Court in HCCRA No. 33 of 2019. The applicant was in Kericho CMC (SO) No. 19 of 2017 charged with the offence of defilement contrary to section 8 (1) as read with section 8 (2) of the Sexual Offences Act. He was convicted of the offence and sentenced to life imprisonment on 31st October 2019. His first appeal before the High Court in Kericho HCCRA No. 33 of 2019 was dismissed by Ongeri, J. on 14th October 2022.
2. The applicant is intent on appealing before this Court albeit out of time. His application is supported by his affidavit sworn on 14th January 2025. The applicant contended that the was not furnished with the proceedings and judgment in good time to enable him appeal out of time.
3. In its written submissions dated 19th February 2025, the state, through Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions Mr. Omutelema, argued that though the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate and unexplainable, the sentence of life imprisonment was lengthy. In the circumstances, it did not oppose the application.
4. Under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022, this Court has discretion to extend time. In determining an application of this nature, this Court is alive to the factors taken into account namely the merit of the appeal, the prejudice, if any, to be suffered by the respondent and the period and length of delay. [See Wasike vs. Swala [1984] KLR 591].
5. I have considered the application, the grounds in support thereof, the period of delay, the respondent’s submissions and the law. I am persuaded that the applicant has met the threshold for the exercise of this Court’s discretion. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order. Thereafter, the record of appeal shall be filed and served within 45 days.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. M. GACHOKA C.ARB, FCIARB.......................................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a True copy of the originalSignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR