[2024] KEHC 14953 (KLR)
The court found that the miscellaneous application was improperly filed as it sought to challenge orders made in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, and no valid reason was provided for not filing the application in the original succession cause. The court held that the applicant's actions amounted to an abuse of court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 14953 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Wilfrida Otieno Ngesa; Respondent: Samuel Wafula; Respondent: Mary Atieno
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application E019 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Stay Confirmation Orders and for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application struck out; miscellaneous cause closed
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Court Process, Probate and Administration, Confirmation of Grant, Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wilfrida Otieno Ngesa
Applicant
Samuel Wafula
Respondent
Mary Atieno
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Stay Confirmation Orders and for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the miscellaneous application was properly filed or constituted an abuse of court process.
- 2 Whether the applicant was entitled to stay of confirmation orders and leave to appeal out of time.
- 3 Whether the cause should be consolidated with the succession cause.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the miscellaneous application was improperly filed as it sought to challenge orders made in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, and no valid reason was provided for not filing the application in the original succession cause. The court held that the applicant's actions amounted to an abuse of court process. The proper procedure would have been to appeal the orders in the original cause or seek leave within that proceeding. The court declined to consolidate the miscellaneous cause with the succession cause, struck out the application, and ordered the file closed, directing that the original succession cause proceed to mention as scheduled.
Court Disposition
application struck out; miscellaneous cause closed
Orders
- The application dated 25th April 2024 is struck out.
- The instant miscellaneous file shall be closed forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Ngesa v Wafula & another (Miscellaneous Application E019 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 14953 (KLR) (28 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14953 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Miscellaneous Application E019 of 2024
WM Musyoka, J
November 28, 2024
Between
Wilfrida Otieno Ngesa
Applicant
and
Samuel Wafula
1st Respondent
Mary Atieno
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. On 20th September 2024 I delivered a ruling herein where I held that the filing of this miscellaneous cause was in abuse of court process, as the application filed herein, dated 25th April 2024, ought to have been filed in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, as it was in respect of orders that had been made on 29th January 2019, in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016.
2. I directed that the file in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016 be availed before me, for perusal, so that I could consider consolidation of this cause with the succession cause.
3. The file in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016 has been availed, and I have perused it. It has a mention date, scheduled for 12th February 2025. I had delivered a ruling, in that cause, Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, on 15th March 2024, where I had struck out a summons, dated 13th July 2023, as it sought distribution of the estate, yet the grant herein had already been confirmed, and the matter was awaiting transmission of the estate, based on confirmation orders made in that cause on 29th January 2019. The mention, scheduled for 12th February 2025, is to confirm whether transmission of the estate has been done in accordance with the orders of 29th January 2019, so that the administration process can be declared complete, and the court file closed.
4. The application filed herein, dated 25th April 2024, seeks stay of the confirmation orders made on 29th January 2019, in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, and leave to file appeal against those orders, out of time. No reason has been advanced, as to why that application was not filed in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, where the impugned order was made, and why an appeal, against the confirmation orders of 29th January 2019, was not filed sooner, or leave to file it was not sought sooner.
5. It would appear that the application filed herein, dated 25th April 2024, was a reaction to the orders made in my ruling of 15th March 2024, in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016. If the applicant was aggrieved by my ruling of 15th March 2024, in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, she should have appealed against the orders made in that ruling, instead of initiating a separate cause, to address matters that are the subject of pending proceedings.
6. I am not persuaded that this cause should be consolidated with Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016. It was initiated in abuse of court process. It should be closed. Let the file in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016 be returned to the registry, to await the mention on 12th February 2025. The application herein, dated 25th April 2024, is hereby struck out. The instant file shall be closed forthwith. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT, AT BUSIA THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024. W MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant.Ms. Wilfrida Otieno Ngesa, the applicant, in person.AdvocatesMr. Odera, instructed by Odhiambo Odera & Company, Advocates for the respondents.