[2023] KEHC 18698 (KLR)
The court found that while the applicant had admitted the offences and the probation report was unfavorable, the unique circumstances of his terminal illness (amputated leg requiring ongoing medical attention) and the complainant's (his mother's) forgiveness and request for his release justified a reconsideration of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 18698 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Godwin Kipkurui Ngetich; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E376 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- Custodial sentence set aside; applicant released from custody and placed on probation for three years.
- Judges
- HK Chemitei
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Revision, Mitigation of Sentence, Probation Orders, Criminal Procedure Code, Remorse and Forgiveness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Godwin Kipkurui Ngetich
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's sentence was illegal, improper, or incorrect under the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the applicant's medical condition and the complainant's forgiveness justify revision of the custodial sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the applicant had admitted the offences and the probation report was unfavorable, the unique circumstances of his terminal illness (amputated leg requiring ongoing medical attention) and the complainant's (his mother's) forgiveness and request for his release justified a reconsideration of the custodial sentence. The court held that the period already served in custody was sufficient as a lesson, and that continued incarceration was not necessary in light of the humanitarian considerations and the interests of justice. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the custodial sentence and substitute it with a probation order for three years, to...
Court Disposition
Custodial sentence set aside; applicant released from custody and placed on probation for three years.
Orders
- The applicant is set free from custody.
- The applicant shall serve a probation period of three years from the date of the ruling as advised by the relevant probation office.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Ngetich v Republic (Criminal Revision E376 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 18698 (KLR) (21 June 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 18698 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Revision E376 of 2022
HK Chemitei, J
June 21, 2023
Between
Godwin Kipkurui Ngetich
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant was charged with the offences of attempted arson contrary to section 333(a) of the penal code, threatening to kill contrary to section 223(1) of the Penal Code, malicious damage to property contrary to section 339(1) of the penal code and creating disturbance contrary to section 95(1) of the penal code.
2. He was sentence to serve five and two years’ imprisonment for the 1st and second count and six months respectively for the last two counts.
3. The applicant has sought revision of the said sentences on the grounds that he was remorseful, terminally ill after his leg was amputated as a result of a road accident and that the complainant who was his mother was ready to forgive him.
4. The learned state counsel opposed the application on the grounds that the grounds for revision are clear and what the applicant had advanced was not one of them. He deponed in the replying affidavit dated February 6, 2023 that the applicant has not demonstrated that the sentence was illegal, improper or incorrect. He prayed that the same be disallowed.
5. The court has perused the record by the trial court and it is apparent that the applicant admitted the offences. In his mitigation he said that he was remorseful. The court took into consideration the probation report which was not favourable to the applicant.
6. It is true that the complainant one CJK the mother to the applicant in her affidavit dated December 2, 2022 has indicated that she had forgiven her son and she be allowed to go back home and take care of his two children and the wife. She also prayed that he be released so that he can continue with medication on his amputated leg.
7. The law on revision is anchored under section 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code Chapter 75 Laws of Kenya. Section 362 states in particular that;'The High Court may call for and examine the record of any criminal proceedings before any subordinate court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of any such subordinate court.'
8. It is clear that this court will only intervene in respect to correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order recorded or passed and regularity of any proceedings.
9. Based however on the reasons that the Applicant’s amputated leg shall need medical attention and the reasons advanced by her mother, it is the consideration of this Court that the period he has been in custody has served well as a lesson.
10. In the circumstances, the applicant is set free from custody and shall serve a probation period of three (3) years from the date herein as shall be advised by the relevant probation office.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA VIDEO LINK AT NAKURU THIS 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2023H. K. CHEMITEIJUDGE