[2025] KEHC 10295 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 10295 (KLR)

The court held that since the stay orders granted earlier had lapsed upon delivery of the ruling on 26/06/2025, and there was no evidence of a pending appeal before the Court of Appeal, the applicant was entitled to enforce the decree. The deposit of Kshs 1,000,000 made as security for the intended appeal was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 10295 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Geoffrey Omwando Ngoge; Respondent: Advanced Gaming Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
16 July 2025
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 1086 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Release of Security Deposit and Enforcement of Decree
Outcome
Application allowed; security deposit to be released to applicant; leave to appeal granted to respondent.
Judges
JN Mulwa
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Costs, Enforcement of Decree
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Costs Enforcement of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Omwando Ngoge

Applicant

Advanced Gaming Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Release of Security Deposit and Enforcement of Decree

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to enforcement of the decree following the lapse of stay orders.
  2. 2 Whether the security deposit of Kshs 1,000,000 should be released to the applicant after the ruling.
  3. 3 Whether a notice of appeal constitutes a valid appeal for purposes of stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the stay orders granted earlier had lapsed upon delivery of the ruling on 26/06/2025, and there was no evidence of a pending appeal before the Court of Appeal, the applicant was entitled to enforce the decree. The deposit of Kshs 1,000,000 made as security for the intended appeal was no longer justified to be held by the court, as its purpose had lapsed with the determination of the stay application. The court further clarified that a notice of appeal does not amount to an appeal and does not by itself operate as a stay of execution. Therefore, the applicant was at liberty to have the security deposit released and to proceed with enforcement of the balance of the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; security deposit to be released to applicant; leave to appeal granted to respondent.

Orders

  • The deposit of Kshs. 1,000,000 deposited in court on 11/09/2024 by Advanced Gaming Limited shall be released to P. K. Matata & Co. Advocates for onward transmission to Geoffrey Omwando Ngoge forthwith.
  • The applicant is at liberty to enforce the decree for the balance of the decretal sum by any lawful means.