[2025] KEELC 5236 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 5236 (KLR)

The court found that the consent judgment entered into by the parties was clear and binding, providing that in the event of default, the plaintiff was entitled to execute for the outstanding balance by transfer or sale of the securities provided. The defendants defaulted on their payment obligations, with cheques...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 5236 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Charles Kibanani Ngome; Defendant: Christiine Nasimiyu Muyaka; Defendant: Stephen Wangusi Fedha; Interested Party: KCB Bank Kenya Limited; Interested Party: Stanley W Nakitare Ndombi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Land Case E008 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Enforcement of Consent Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
EC Cherono
Legal Topics
Consent Judgment Enforcement, Execution of Decree, Security for Debt, Transfer of Land Titles, Default on Payment, Sale of Collateral
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Consent Judgment Enforcement Execution of Decree Security for Debt Transfer of Land Titles Default on Payment Sale of Collateral

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Kibanani Ngome

Plaintiff

Christiine Nasimiyu Muyaka

Defendant

Stephen Wangusi Fedha

Defendant

KCB Bank Kenya Limited

Interested Party

Stanley W Nakitare Ndombi

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Enforcement of Consent Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to enforcement of the consent judgment through transfer of the charged properties due to default by the defendants.
  2. 2 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be authorized to execute transfer instruments for the subject parcels to recover the outstanding debt.
  3. 3 Whether the defendants are entitled to retain any of the securities after partial payment and default.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the consent judgment entered into by the parties was clear and binding, providing that in the event of default, the plaintiff was entitled to execute for the outstanding balance by transfer or sale of the securities provided. The defendants defaulted on their payment obligations, with cheques dishonoured and no further payments made. The court rejected the defendants' argument that partial payment entitled them to retain any of the securities or that the plaintiff should refund the partial payment before enforcing the judgment. The consent did not specify the order or manner of sale of the securities, and the plaintiff undertook to account for any surplus realized...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Deputy Registrar is authorized to execute transfer instruments for L.R NO. NDIVISI/MUCHI/9XX1, NDIVISI/MUCHI/10XX5, and NDIVISI/MUCHI/2XX4 in favour of the plaintiff or third parties to recover the outstanding sum of Kshs. 6,000,000 and attendant costs as per the consent judgment/order dated 26th April 2024.
  • Costs of the application awarded to the plaintiff.