[2023] KEELRC 1333 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1333 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st respondent, having failed to pay the work injury compensation of Kshs 1,209,408 as assessed and directed by the 2nd respondent under the Work Injury Benefits Act, violated the statutory and constitutional rights of the petitioner as administrator of the deceased's estate. The absence of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1333 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Syombua Ngovi (Suing as the administrator and legal representative of the Late Kennedy John Ngovi); Respondent: Muloil Limited; Respondent: Director Of Occupational Safety And Health Services
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E010 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Petition allowed. Judgment entered for the petitioner against the 1st respondent. Mandamus issued against the 2nd respondent. No order as to costs.
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Work Injury Benefits, Employer Liability, Compensation Awards, Statutory Duties, Constitutional Rights Enforcement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Work Injury Benefits Employer Liability Compensation Awards Statutory Duties Constitutional Rights Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Syombua Ngovi (Suing as the administrator and legal representative of the Late Kennedy John Ngovi)

Applicant

Muloil Limited

Respondent

Director Of Occupational Safety And Health Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 1st respondent's failure to pay the assessed work injury compensation violates the petitioner's constitutional rights.
  2. 2 Whether an order of mandamus should issue compelling the 2nd respondent to take statutory action against the 1st respondent for non-payment of the award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st respondent, having failed to pay the work injury compensation of Kshs 1,209,408 as assessed and directed by the 2nd respondent under the Work Injury Benefits Act, violated the statutory and constitutional rights of the petitioner as administrator of the deceased's estate. The absence of any response or challenge from the respondents meant the facts were uncontroverted. The statutory obligation to pay the assessed sum became due upon the 2nd respondent's assessment, and the 2nd respondent was under a duty to enforce compliance. The court therefore granted judgment for the petitioner, ordering the 1st respondent to pay the assessed sum and issuing a mandamus...

Court Disposition

Petition allowed. Judgment entered for the petitioner against the 1st respondent. Mandamus issued against the 2nd respondent. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • The 1st respondent shall pay the sum of Kshs 1,209,408 awarded for work injury to the petitioner.
  • An order of mandamus is issued directing the 2nd respondent to commence investigations and action against the 1st respondent for failure to pay the work injury award.