[2024] KECPT 1522 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1522 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to be furnished with the legal charge instrument and accurate loan statements, as members have a statutory right to such information under the Cooperative Societies Act. The Tribunal noted that the respondent failed to provide statements reflecting the claimant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1522 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Esther Mumbi Ngugi; Respondent: Chamber Unity Savings & Credit Co-operative Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 102 (E055) of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim partly allowed
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Loan Default, Member Rights, Account Statement Disclosure, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure Loan Default Member Rights Account Statement Disclosure Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esther Mumbi Ngugi

Applicant

Chamber Unity Savings & Credit Co-operative Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to be furnished with the legal charge instrument and loan repayment statements by the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a perpetual injunction restraining the respondent from dealing with the collateral property.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to general damages for the respondent's actions.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to be furnished with the legal charge instrument and accurate loan statements, as members have a statutory right to such information under the Cooperative Societies Act. The Tribunal noted that the respondent failed to provide statements reflecting the claimant's alleged repayments in 2016 and 2017, and that the respondent's temporary office closure did not absolve it of its obligations. The prayer for a perpetual injunction was deemed spent, as the suit had been determined, and the claim for general damages failed for lack of specific pleading and proof. The Tribunal therefore granted the order for disclosure of documents but declined the...

Court Disposition

claim partly allowed

Orders

  • The respondent shall supply copies of the charge document against Title No. Ruiru/Ruiru East Block 2/7560 and the claimant's loan statements capturing repayments made in 2016 and 2017 within 14 days of the judgment.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs.