[2023] KEMC 215 (KLR)
The court found that liability for the accident had been settled by consent at 80:20 in favour of the plaintiff. On special damages, the court held that only KES 3,000 was specifically pleaded and strictly proved, as the other receipts and invoices were illegible. The claim for loss of earnings was dismissed for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEMC 215 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jane Ruguru Ngugi; Defendant: Peter Muiruri Kamau
- Court
- Magistrate's Court
- Court Station
- Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 8220 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff.
- Judges
- JP Aduke
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Accidents, Negligence, Personal Injury, Damages Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Ruguru Ngugi
Plaintiff
Peter Muiruri Kamau
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was liable for the road traffic accident that caused injury to the plaintiff.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for pain and suffering.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to special damages and loss of earnings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that liability for the accident had been settled by consent at 80:20 in favour of the plaintiff. On special damages, the court held that only KES 3,000 was specifically pleaded and strictly proved, as the other receipts and invoices were illegible. The claim for loss of earnings was dismissed for lack of documentary proof and supporting testimony, in line with established legal principles requiring strict proof of special damages. For general damages, the court considered the nature of the plaintiff's injuries (fractures of both legs), comparable case law, and economic factors, awarding KES 400,000. The court awarded costs and interest as per standard practice.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Orders
- General damages of KES 400,000 awarded to the plaintiff.
- Special damages of KES 3,000 awarded to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Ngugi v Kamau (Civil Suit 8220 of 2018) [2023] KEMC 215 (KLR) (15 June 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 215 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts
Civil Suit 8220 of 2018
JP Aduke, SRM
June 15, 2023
Between
Jane Ruguru Ngugi
Plaintiff
and
Peter Muiruri Kamau
Defendant
Judgment
1. The Plaintiff filed this suit against the defendants after she sustained injuries following a road traffic accident on 07th October 2015 along Thika road in Nairobi. In the plaint available on record, the plaintiff avers she was a lawful fare paying passenger aboard motor vehicle registration number KBL 206N when the Defendant either acting as servant/agent/authorized driver of motor vehicle registration number KBL 206N negligently drove the said motor vehicle that it got hit by motor vehicle registration number KBM 477K causing the Plaintiff to suffer injuries.
2. The Plaintiff blames the Defendant and their agents/authorized servants for causing the said accident. The Plaintiff further avers that the said accident was solely caused by the negligence of the Defendant.
3. The particulars of injuries sustained by the Plaintiff are captured in para 6 of the Plaint while the particulars of alleged negligence are also captured in para 6a of the Plaint. The Plaintiff prays for general damages for pain and suffering, special damages, loss of earnings, costs of the suit and interest at court rates.
4. Return of Service on Record shows that the defendants were served with the suit papers. The suit is defended At the hearing thereof, parties recorded a consent on liability in favour of the Plaintiff in the ratio of 80:20. The court hereby endorses these terms as a judgment of this court. Parties filed and exchanged submissions. The issues for determination before this court is one:
1. Quontum 5. The Plaintiff prays for General Damages, Special Damages, loss of earnings, Costs of the Suit and any other relief. With respect to Special Damages, the Plaint prays for KES 200,000/- as captured in the Plaint. I have seen receipts and invoices on record that are not legible. It is settled principle that special damages must be pleaded and proved. I find that KES 3,000/- has been pleaded and proved and award the same.
6. With respect to loss of earnings, it is settled law that a claim for loss of earnings/amenities of life is of the nature of special damages. This means the same must be pleaded and strictly proved on a balance of probability. From the documents available on record, I have not seen any documentary proof of the income the plaintiff used to make prior to the said road traffic accident. In the absence of documentary proof, the plaintiff elected not to call any witnesses to testify on this alleged fact. On a balance of probabilities, I find myself persuaded and bound by the holding of the court of appeal in Cecilia W. Mwangi & Another vs Ruth W. Mwangi CA Civil Appeal Number 251 of 1997EKLR and SJ vs Franscesco Di Nello & Another (2015) eKLR on how to treat loss of earnings as a special damage claim. Consequently, I make no award in this regard.
7. With respect to general damages, I have considered all the submissions on record and the authorities annexed thereto. I have also considered all the exhibits on record. In particular, I have relied on the reasoning of the court in Civil Appeal Number 126 of 2018 Benuel Bosire vs Lydia Kemunto Mokora[2019]eKLR and Patrisiah Adhiammbo Omolo vs Emily Mandala[2020] EKLR where the courts awarded general damages for comparable injuries. From the documents on record, the plaintiff in this instance suffered a fracture of the right and left leg and when the accident happened. Taking into account that no amount of damages can restore the Plaintiff to what he was prior to the said accident, the rate of inflation and cost of living, I hereby award KES 400,000/- as general damages.
8. In conclusion, I enter judgement in favour of the plaintiff as follows:1. General damages KES 400,000/-2. Special damages KES 3,000/-3. Costs of the suit.4. Interest on 1 and 3 above at court rates.
9. The Plaintiff shall have costs in this suit and interests as outlined above from the date of this judgement until payment in full.
ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATEJUDGEMENT SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY IN NAIROBI THIS 15TH JUNE 2023 IN THE ABSENCE/PRESENCE OF THE PARTIES AT 11. 30AM.In the presence of :1. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe.2. Counsel for the Plaintiff-........ N/A ......(Name, Signature, Date)For the Defence: ............. N/A .............(Name, Signature, Date)