[2013] KEHC 2658 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2658 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had taken steps to regularize their interest in the disputed land through succession proceedings and the process of setting apart the land, while the respondent had obtained title to adjacent parcels during the same period. The court noted that the question of whether the parties...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 2658 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ngumbao Ali Menza; Plaintiff: Alfred Bandika Birya; Defendant: Karsan Ramji & Sons Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 186 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted pending hearing on the merits.
Judges
SN Mukunya
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Land Adjudication, Title Disputes, Succession and Estates
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Temporary Injunctions Land Adjudication Title Disputes Succession and Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ngumbao Ali Menza

Plaintiff

Alfred Bandika Birya

Plaintiff

Karsan Ramji & Sons Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the respondent from constructing a perimeter wall on the disputed land.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have established a prima facie case with a probability of success regarding ownership and possession of the disputed land.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent has encroached on the applicants' unregistered land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had taken steps to regularize their interest in the disputed land through succession proceedings and the process of setting apart the land, while the respondent had obtained title to adjacent parcels during the same period. The court noted that the question of whether the parties share a boundary and whether encroachment occurred could only be determined at a full hearing on the merits. In the interim, to preserve the status quo and prevent possible irreparable harm, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondent from constructing a perimeter wall on the disputed land as prayed by the applicants.

Court Disposition

Temporary injunction granted pending hearing on the merits.

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the respondent from constructing a perimeter wall on the disputed land as prayed in paragraph 3 of the application.
  • The case shall be fixed for hearing on merit.