[2024] KEELRC 2688 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 2688 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was injured in the course of employment, the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services assessed and awarded compensation, and the respondent neither objected to nor appealed the award. The respondent failed to pay the assessed sum as required by law. The court held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2688 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nelson Kahindi Ngumbao; Respondent: Royal Mark Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E038 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Director's Award as Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Work Injury Benefits, Compensation Awards, Adoption of Directors Award
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Work Injury Benefits Compensation Awards Adoption of Directors Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nelson Kahindi Ngumbao

Applicant

Royal Mark Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Director's Award as Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court should adopt the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services' award as a judgment of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to payment of Ksh.519,378.33 as assessed by the Director.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent is obligated to pay the award in the absence of an objection or appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was injured in the course of employment, the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services assessed and awarded compensation, and the respondent neither objected to nor appealed the award. The respondent failed to pay the assessed sum as required by law. The court held that it has jurisdiction to adopt the Director's award as a judgment for execution under the Constitution and the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act. The application was merited and allowed, with the Director's award adopted as the judgment of the court and the respondent ordered to pay the assessed sum to the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The award of the Director dated 27 April 2023 is adopted as the judgment of the court.
  • The sum of Ksh.519,378.33 is payable to the applicant by the respondent.